Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov;42(6):1304-1315.
doi: 10.1111/opo.13030. Epub 2022 Jul 31.

A mixed-methods characterisation of patient safety incidents by primary eye care practitioners

Affiliations

A mixed-methods characterisation of patient safety incidents by primary eye care practitioners

Elinor MacFarlane et al. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: Patient safety in eye health care is an underdeveloped field of research. A patient safety incident occurs when an unintended incident happens that could have (or did) lead to harm. To enable learning from patient safety incidents in optometry, a characterisation of commonly experienced safety incidents is needed to identify options to improve the quality of care. This study aimed to characterise eye health-related patient safety incidents from the perspective of eye care practitioners.

Methods: At a national conference in Wales, 56 eye care practitioners participated in a stakeholder workshop on eye care-related patient safety incidents. Participants were asked to suggest patient safety incidents that have occurred, or based on their experience, could occur in optometric practice. Using the nominal group technique, participants voted on the incident they perceived could cause the most harm and the incident observed most frequently in practice. Framework analysis supported identification of themes about the nature and outcomes of incidents in eye care.

Results: Diagnostic incidents were perceived to be the most severe (highest number of 'severity votes', n = 38), whilst administration-related incidents were most frequent (highest number of 'frequency votes' n = 39). Four themes were identified which are as follows: inappropriate clinical decision-making; delayed or missed referral of patients to general medical practitioners or ophthalmologists; compromised communication with other practitioners or patients and delays in receiving eye care. The results suggest that incidents relating to inappropriate clinical decision-making could result in the most severe harm to patients but may not occur frequently.

Conclusions: Diagnostic- and administrative-related incidents pose clear challenges for improvement in quality and safety of care. The breadth of themes reflecting the nature and outcomes from unsafe eye care highlights the complexity underpinning incidents and the burden to patients. This work has informed the content of an all-Wales incident report form for primary eye care practitioners.

Keywords: eye; eyecare; incident; optometry; patient safety; primary care; public health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interest and have no proprietary interest in any of the materials mentioned in this article.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Suggested incidents and participant votes in the ‘medication’ category.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Data collection process.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Percentage of suggested incidents within each of the five categories.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Number of ‘frequency’ and ‘severity’ votes for incidents in each of the five categories.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Number of incidents, according to the locus of control, represented as the percentage of incidents within each incident category.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Number of incidents, at each level of harm severity, represented as a percentage of the total incidents classified within each incident category.
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
Proportion of frequency and severity votes for incidents within each theme.

References

    1. World Health Organisation . Patient safety. Available from: https://www.who.int/news‐room/fact‐sheets/detail/patient‐safety. Accessed 21 July 2022.
    1. World Health Organisation . Resolution WHA55 18. Quality of care: patient safety. In: Fifty‐fifth World Health Assembly, Geneva, 13–18th May 2002. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/259364/WHA55‐2002‐REC1‐.... Accessed 21 July 2022.
    1. World Health Organisation . Global patient safety action plan 2021–2030. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/integrated‐health‐services/patient‐safety/poli.... Accessed 21 July 2022.
    1. NHS England . Report a patient safety incident. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/patient‐safety/report‐patient‐safety‐incident/. Accessed 21 July 2022.
    1. Loh H, de Korne D, Chee S, Mathur R. Reducing wrong intraocular lens implants in cataract surgery: 3 years of experience with the SEIPS framework in Singapore. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2017;30:492–505. - PubMed

Publication types