Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep;65(5):420-429.
doi: 10.5468/ogs.22106. Epub 2022 Jul 29.

Ritodrine in external cephalic version: is it effective and safe?

Sin Ae Kim  1 , Eun-Hwan Cha  1 , Kyoung-Chul Chun  1 , Young Ah Kim  1 , Jae-Whoan Koh  1 , Jung Yeol Han  1   2 , Jong Hee Hwang  3
Affiliations

Ritodrine in external cephalic version: is it effective and safe?

Sin Ae Kim et al. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: The external cephalic version (ECV) has been shown to lower the likelihood of cesarean section requirements among pregnant women with breech presentations. In the current study, we investigated the effectiveness and safety of ritodrine as a tocolytic for ECV.

Methods: A total of 407 pregnant women with breech presentations, who had no contraindications for ECV, were enrolled in this study. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess the impact of ritodrine use on the safety and efficacy of ECV.

Results: The overall success rate was 67.6%, and ritodrine use was associated with significantly higher odds of successful ECV after adjusting for confounders. Moreover, using ritodrine did not increase the risk of adverse effects, including temporary changes in fetal heart rate, need for elective or emergency cesarean section due to fetal distress during ECV, low Apgar scores, and perinatal mortality.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that using ritodrine as a tocolytic during ECV may increase the likelihood of ECV success and may not increase adverse perinatal outcomes.

Keywords: External cephalic version; Pregnancy; Pregnancy outcomes; Ritodrine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study profile. ECV, external cephalic version.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Kim AM, Park JH, Kang S, Yoon TH, Kim Y. An ecological study of geographic variation and factors associated with cesarean section rates in South Korea. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19162 - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization (WHO) WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Geneva: WHO; 2015.
    1. Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990–2014. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0148343. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mylonas I, Friese K. Indications for and risks of elective cesarean section. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015;112:489–95. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim GJ. Reviving external cephalic version: a review of its efficacy, safety, and technical aspects. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2019;62:371–81. - PMC - PubMed