Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 1;21(1):139.
doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01023-1.

Where would Canadians prefer to die? Variation by situational severity, support for family obligations, and age in a national study

Laura M Funk  1 , Corey S Mackenzie  2 , Maria Cherba  3 , Nicole Del Rosario  2 , Marian Krawczyk  4 , Andrea Rounce  5 , Kelli Stajduhar  6 , S Robin Cohen  7
Affiliations

Where would Canadians prefer to die? Variation by situational severity, support for family obligations, and age in a national study

Laura M Funk et al. BMC Palliat Care. .

Abstract

Background: Death at home has been identified as a key quality indicator for Canadian health care systems and is often assumed to reflect the wishes of the entire Canadian public. Although research in other countries has begun to question this assumption, there is a dearth of rigorous evidence of a national scope in Canada. This study addresses this gap and extends it by exploring three factors that moderate preferences for setting of death: situational severity (entailing both symptoms and supports), perceptions of family obligation, and respondent age.

Methods: Two thousand five hundred adult respondents from the general population were recruited using online panels between August 2019 and January 2020. The online survey included three vignettes, representing distinct dying scenarios which increased in severity based on symptom management alongside availability of formal and informal support. Following each vignette respondents rated their preference for each setting of death (home, acute/intensive care, palliative care unit, nursing home) for that scenario. They also provided sociodemographic information and completed a measure of beliefs about family obligations for end-of-life care.

Results: Home was the clearly preferred setting only for respondents in the mild severity scenario. As the dying scenario worsened, preferences fell for home death and increased for the other options, such that in the severe scenario, most respondents preferred a palliative care or hospice setting. This pattern was particularly distinct among respondents who also were less supportive of family obligation norms, and for adults 65 years of age and older.

Conclusions: Home is not universally the preferred setting for dying. The public, especially older persons and those expressing lower expectations of families in general, express greater preference for palliative care settings in situations where they might have less family or formal supports accompanied by more severe and uncontrolled symptoms. Findings suggest a) the need for public policy and health system quality indicators to reflect the nuances of public preferences, b) the need for adequate investment in hospices and palliative care settings, and c) continuing efforts to ensure that home-based formal services are available to help people manage symptoms and meet their preferences for setting of death.

Keywords: Canada; Dying preferences; Family care; Palliative care; Perception; Place of death; Public policy; Surveys and questionnaires.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Preference for four dying options crossed by scenario severity and family obligation
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Preference for four dying options crossed by scenario severity and respondent age
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Wilson DM, Truman CD, Thomas R, Fainsinger R, Kovacs-Burns K, Froggatt K, et al. The rapidly changing location of death in Canada, 1994–2004. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68(10):1752–1758. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.03.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pivodic L, Pardon K, Morin L, Addington-Hall J, Miccinesi G, Cardenas-Turanzas M, et al. Place of death in the population dying from diseases indicative of palliative care need: a cross-national population-level study in 14 countries. J Epidemiol Community Heal. 2016;70(1):17–24. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-205365. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Funk LM. Home healthcare and family responsibility: a critical discourse analysis of talk and text. Healthc policy. 2013;9(SP):86. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hankivsky O, Grace D, Hunting G, Giesbrecht M, Fridkin A, Rudrum S, et al. An intersectionality-based policy analysis framework: critical reflections on a methodology for advancing equity. Int J Equity Health. 2014;13(1):1–16. doi: 10.1186/s12939-014-0119-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van Pevenage I, Durivage P, Dequin A-M, Hamel-Roy L. Do older adults wish to die at home (and can they?). In: Billette V, Marier P, Seguin A-M, editors. Getting Wise about Getting Old: Debunking Myths about Aging. Vancouver: Purich Books; 2020. p. 207–214.