Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr;68(4):1473-1481.
doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07640-3. Epub 2022 Jul 31.

Computed Tomography-Based Deep Learning Nomogram Can Accurately Predict Lymph Node Metastasis in Gastric Cancer

Affiliations

Computed Tomography-Based Deep Learning Nomogram Can Accurately Predict Lymph Node Metastasis in Gastric Cancer

Xiao Guan et al. Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Computed tomography is the most commonly used imaging modality for preoperative assessment of lymph node status, but the reported accuracy is unsatisfactory.

Aims: To evaluate and verify the predictive performance of computed tomography deep learning on the presurgical evaluation of lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer.

Methods: 347 patients were retrospectively selected (training cohort: 242, test cohort: 105). The enhanced computed tomography arterial phase images of gastric cancer were used for lesion segmentation, radiomics and deep learning feature extraction. Three methods were used for feature selection. Support vector machine (SVM) or random forest (RF) was used to build models. The classification performance of the models was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). We also established a nomogram that included clinical predictors.

Results: The model based on ResNet50-RF showed favorable classification performance and was verified in the test cohort (AUC = 0.9803). The nomogram based on deep learning feature scores and the lymph node status reported by computed tomography showed excellent discrimination. AUC of 0.9978 was achieved in the training cohort and verified in the test cohort (AUC = 0.9914). Decision analysis curve showed the value of nomogram in clinical application.

Conclusion: The computed tomography-based deep learning nomogram can accurately and effectively evaluate lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer before surgery.

Keywords: Deep learning; Gastric cancer; Lymph node metastasis; Nomogram.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Feature selection using LASSO. A MSE: Mean square error. Using tenfold cross-validation and iterating 100,000 times for parameter tuning to filter out the best lambda value. B Using the best lambda value for feature selecting
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Violin chart of deep learning feature scores of training cohort (A) and test cohort (B). 1: Male; 2: Female; The wider parts of the figure indicates that the patients in this group are more likely to adopt the given value and the narrower parts represents the lower probability
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Deep learning nomogram. The deep learning nomogram was constructed in the training cohort, including deep learning feature scores and the LN status reported by CT. Image: The LN status reported by CT. Score: The deep learning feature scores. 0: Lymph node metastasis negative; 1: Lymph node metastasis positive
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
ROC curves of the deep learning nomogram in each cohort. p P value of Delong test
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Calibration curves of the deep learning nomogram in each cohort. A Training cohort. B Test cohort. Dashed lines indicate perfect predictions. The prediction performances of the deep learning nomogram are represented by solid lines. The solid line and the dashed line are very close, which indicates that the deep learning nomogram has excellent predictive performance
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
DCA for the ResNet50-RF model and the deep learning nomogram in each cohort. A Training cohort. B Test cohort. The gray line indicates that it is assumed that all patients have LN metastasis. The black line indicates that it is assumed that all patients have no LN metastasis

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel R. et al Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rice TW, Gress DM, Patil DT, Hofstetter WL, Kelsen DP, Blackstone EH. Cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction-Major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67(4):304–317. - PubMed
    1. Zhou YX, Yang LP, Wang Z. X et al, Lymph node staging systems in patients with gastric cancer treated with D2 resection plus adjuvant chemotherapy. J Cancer. 2018;9(4):660–666. doi: 10.7150/jca.22016. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fukagawa T, Katai H, Mizusawa J, et al. A prospective multi-institutional validity study to evaluate the accuracy of clinical diagnosis of pathological stage III gastric cancer (JCOG1302A) Gastric Cancer. 2018;21(1):68–73. doi: 10.1007/s10120-017-0701-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smyth EC, Verheij M, Allum W, Cunningham D, Cervantes A, Arnold D. Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(suppl 5):v38–v49. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw350. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types