Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;62(5):626-634.
doi: 10.1111/ajo.13585. Epub 2022 Jul 31.

Screening for adverse childhood experiences in antenatal care settings: A scoping review

Nam Tran  1   2 , Leonie Callaway  3   4 , Sitong Shen  5 , Tuhin Biswas  1   2 , James G Scott  6   7 , Fran Boyle  1   8 , Abdullah Mamun  1   2   9
Affiliations

Screening for adverse childhood experiences in antenatal care settings: A scoping review

Nam Tran et al. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are associated with many health problems in women during pregnancy, including depression/anxiety, gestational diabetes and adverse birth outcomes. However, unlike other health risk factors, screening for ACEs has not been widely implemented in antenatal care settings.

Aims: The aim of the scoping review was to explore the challenges in screening for ACEs in antenatal care settings and to provide the lessons learnt and evidence that guide the practice of ACE screening for both healthcare providers and pregnant women.

Methods: A five-stage process for conducting the scoping review was utilised. Searches of four key databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL and SCOPUS) and reference lists from relevant studies were conducted.

Results: Seven publications met the inclusion criteria. Challenges identified for healthcare providers in screening for ACEs include lack of knowledge and confidence in ACE tool and shortage of time and resources to undertake screening. Impediments for pregnant women include concerns about privacy. However, there were examples of effective practice for ACE screening in antenatal care settings that could apply widely.

Conclusion: Addressing impediments to ACE screening is critical in implementing trauma-informed practices that can identify women at risk of adverse health outcomes during pregnancy. A study on screening for ACEs in antenatal care in both public and private settings is needed to examine its feasibility and acceptability in the Australian context before being included in the National Perinatal Data Collection.

Keywords: adverse childhood experiences; antenatal care; pregnant women; scoping review; screening..

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses) flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Hughes K, Bellis MA, Hardcastle KA et al. The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Lancet Public Health 2017; 2(8): e356–e366. - PubMed
    1. Loxton D, Forder PM, Cavenagh D et al. The impact of adverse childhood experiences on the health and health behaviors of young Australian women. Child Abuse Negl 2021; 111: 104771. - PubMed
    1. Felitti VJ, Anda RF, Nordenberg D et al. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The adverse childhood experiences (ACE) study. Am J Prev Med 1998; 14(4): 245–258. - PubMed
    1. Testa A, Jackson DB, Ganson KT, Nagata JM. Maternal adverse childhood experiences and pregnancy intentions. Ann Epidemiol 2021; 64: 47–52. - PubMed
    1. Young‐Wolff KC, Wei J, Varnado N et al. Adverse childhood experiences and pregnancy intentions among pregnant women seeking prenatal care. Womens Health Issues 2021; 31(2): 100–106. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances