Cost-utility analysis of cemented hemiarthroplasty versus hydroxyapatite-coated uncemented hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures : the World Hip Trauma Evaluation 5 (WHiTE 5) trial
- PMID: 35909375
- DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B8.BJJ-2022-0417.R1
Cost-utility analysis of cemented hemiarthroplasty versus hydroxyapatite-coated uncemented hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures : the World Hip Trauma Evaluation 5 (WHiTE 5) trial
Erratum in
-
Erratum.Bone Joint J. 2022 Oct;104-B(10):1190. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B9.BJJ-2022-00025. Bone Joint J. 2022. PMID: 36177647 No abstract available.
Abstract
Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of cemented hemiarthroplasty (HA) versus hydroxyapatite-coated uncemented HA for the treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures in older adults.
Methods: A within-trial economic evaluation was conducted based on data collected from the World Hip Trauma Evaluation 5 (WHiTE 5) multicentre randomized controlled trial in the UK. Resource use was measured over 12 months post-randomization using trial case report forms and participant-completed questionnaires. Cost-effectiveness was reported in terms of incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained from the NHS and personal social service perspective. Methodological uncertainty was addressed using sensitivity analysis, while decision uncertainty was represented graphically using confidence ellipses and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.
Results: The base-case analysis showed that cemented implants were cost-saving (mean cost difference -£961 (95% confidence interval (CI) -£2,292 to £370)) and increased QALYs (mean QALY difference 0.010 (95% CI 0.002 to 0.017)) when compared to uncemented implants. The probability of the cemented implant being cost-effective approximated between 95% and 97% at alternative cost-effectiveness thresholds held by decision-makers, and its net monetary benefit was positive. The findings remained robust against all the pre-planned sensitivity analyses.
Conclusion: This study shows that cemented HA is cost-effective compared with hydroxyapatite-coated uncemented HA in older adults with displaced intracapsular hip fractures. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(8):922-928.
Keywords: Cement; Cost; Effectiveness; Hemiarthroplasty; Hip; Trauma; cemented hemiarthroplasty; cemented implants; displaced intracapsular hip fractures; hip fractures; hydroxyapatite; multicentre randomized controlled trial; sensitivity analysis; uncemented hemiarthroplasty.
Similar articles
-
Randomised controlled trial comparing hydroxyapatite coated uncemented hemiarthroplasty with cemented hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures: a protocol for the WHITE 5 study.BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 9;9(12):e033957. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033957. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31822548 Free PMC article.
-
Cemented or uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures of the hip: a randomized trial of 400 patients.Bone Joint J. 2020 Jan;102-B(1):11-16. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B1.BJJ-2019-1041.R1. Bone Joint J. 2020. PMID: 31888358 Clinical Trial.
-
Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: 5-year followup of a randomized trial.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Apr;472(4):1291-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3308-9. Epub 2013 Oct 1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014. PMID: 24081667 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effectiveness and safety of cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of intracapsular hip fractures.Bone Joint J. 2020 Sep;102-B(9):1113-1121. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B9.BJJ-2020-0282.R1. Bone Joint J. 2020. PMID: 32862675
-
Mortality associated with cemented and uncemented fixation of hemiarthroplasty and total hip replacement in the surgical management of intracapsular hip fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Injury. 2022 Jul;53(7):2605-2616. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.04.010. Epub 2022 May 13. Injury. 2022. PMID: 35595550
Cited by
-
Infection after intracapsular femoral neck fracture - does antibiotic-loaded bone cement reduce infection risk after hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty?Bone Joint Res. 2023 May 16;12(5):331-338. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.125.BJR-2022-0314.R1. Bone Joint Res. 2023. PMID: 37191182 Free PMC article.
-
Cemented Versus Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty for Displaced Intracapsular Neck of Femur Fractures in the Elderly: Outcomes and Costings.Indian J Orthop. 2024 Apr 1;58(6):716-721. doi: 10.1007/s43465-024-01132-4. eCollection 2024 Jun. Indian J Orthop. 2024. PMID: 38812858 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence for cemented TKA and THA based on a comparison of international register data.Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2024 Aug;53(8):597-607. doi: 10.1007/s00132-024-04489-4. Epub 2024 Apr 3. Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2024. PMID: 38568216 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Register data on cemented arthroplasty : A proof for cementless fixation?].Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2024 Mar;53(3):163-175. doi: 10.1007/s00132-023-04451-w. Epub 2023 Oct 27. Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2024. PMID: 37889315 Free PMC article. Review. German.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical