Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 14:13:935905.
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.935905. eCollection 2022.

Comparing Clinical and Genetic Characteristics of De Novo and Inherited COL1A1/COL1A2 Variants in a Large Chinese Cohort of Osteogenesis Imperfecta

Affiliations

Comparing Clinical and Genetic Characteristics of De Novo and Inherited COL1A1/COL1A2 Variants in a Large Chinese Cohort of Osteogenesis Imperfecta

Yazhao Mei et al. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Purpose: Nearly 85%-90% of osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) cases are caused by autosome dominant mutations of COL1A1 and COL1A2 genes, of which de novo mutations cover a large proportion, whereas their characteristics remain to be elucidated. This study aims to compare the differences in clinical and genetic characteristics of de novo and inherited COL1A1/COL1A2 mutations of OI, assess the average paternal and maternal age at conception in de novo mutations, and research the rate of nonpenetrance in inherited mutations.

Materials and methods: A retrospective comparison between de novo and inherited mutations was performed among 135 OI probands with COL1A1/COL1A2 mutations. Mutational analyses of all probands and their family members were completed by Sanger sequencing. A new clinical scoring system was developed to assess the clinical severity of OI quantitatively.

Results: A total of 51 probands (37.78%) with de novo mutations and 84 probands (62.22%) with inherited mutations were grouped by the results of the parental gene verification. The proportion of clinical type III (P<0.001) and clinical scores (P<0.001) were significantly higher in de novo mutations. Missense mutations covered a slightly higher proportion of de novo COL1A1 mutations (46.34%) compared with inherited COL1A1 mutations (33.33%), however, lacking a significant difference (P=0.1923). The mean BMD Z/T-score at the lumbar spine in de novo mutations was -2.3 ± 1.5, lower than inherited mutations (-1.7 ± 1.8), but lacking statistical significance (P=0.0742). There was no significant difference between the two groups in OI-related phenotypes (like fracture frequency, blue sclera, and hearing loss) and biochemical indexes. In de novo mutations, the average paternal and maternal age at conception was 29.2 (P<0.05) and 26.8 (P<0.0001), respectively, which were significantly younger than the average gestational age of the population. Additionally, 98.04% of pedigrees (50/51) with de novo mutations were spontaneous conception. The rate of nonpenetrance of parents with pathogenic variants in the inherited mutation group was 25.64% (20/78).

Conclusions: Our data revealed that the proportion of clinical type III and clinical scores were significantly higher in de novo mutations than in inherited mutations, demonstrating that de novo mutations are more damaging because they have not undergone purifying selection.

Keywords: COL1A1; COL1A2; clinical scoring system; de novo; inherited; osteogenesis imperfecta.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of study cohort selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
X-ray radiography of the lower extremities of six de novo and two inherited mutation probands with clinical type III, and diagrams showing mutation loci identified in this study. (A, B) X-ray radiography of the femurs of the probands (p68 and p56) with inherited mutations. (C–H) X-ray radiography of the lower extremities of the probands (P9, P3, P49, P43, P13, and P26, respectively) with de novo mutations. (I) Mutation loci in COL1A1 gene identified in two groups. (J) Mutation loci in COL1A2 gene identified in two groups.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Genotype-phenotype correlations in de novo and inherited mutations. (A, B) Frequency of clinical type for each mutation type in De novo and Inherited. (C–F) The bubble plots of the clinical score of available probands with de novo or inherited COL1A1/COL1A2 mutations. X-axis represented the mutation site on the COL1A1/COL1A2 gene; Y-axis was the clinical score; the colors of the bubble represented different mutation effects (missense, nonsense, frameshift, and splice, respectively); the size of the bubble indicated the mutation frequency of each mutation site in the de novo or inherited mutation group. The bubble was higher and bigger; the phenotype was more severe, and the mutation site was more frequent.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Forlino A, Marini JC. Osteogenesis Imperfecta. Lancet (2016) 387(10028):1657–71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00728-X - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sillence DO, Senn A, Danks DM. Genetic Heterogeneity in Osteogenesis Imperfecta. J Med Genet (1979) 16(2):101–16. doi: 10.1136/jmg.16.2.101 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhytnik L, Simm K, Salumets A, Peters M, Märtson A, Maasalu K. Reproductive Options for Families at Risk of Osteogenesis Imperfecta: A Review. Orphanet J Rare Dis (2020) 15(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s13023-020-01404-w - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marini JC, Forlino A, Cabral WA, Barnes AM, San Antonio JD, Milgrom S, et al. . Consortium for Osteogenesis Imperfecta Mutations in the Helical Domain of Type I Collagen: Regions Rich in Lethal Mutations Align With Collagen Binding Sites for Integrins and Proteoglycans. Hum Mutat (2007) 28(3):209–21. doi: 10.1002/humu.20429 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roach JC, Glusman G, Smit AFA, Huff CD, Hubley R, Shannon PT, et al. . Analysis of Genetic Inheritance in a Family Quartet by Whole-Genome Sequencing. Science (2010) 328(5978):636–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1186802 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms