Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Mar 6;4(6):1800118.
doi: 10.1002/gch2.201800118. eCollection 2020 Jun.

Microplastics in Freshwater Biota: A Critical Review of Isolation, Characterization, and Assessment Methods

Affiliations
Review

Microplastics in Freshwater Biota: A Critical Review of Isolation, Characterization, and Assessment Methods

James D O'Connor et al. Glob Chall. .

Abstract

Freshwater systems provide key pathways for microplastic (MP) pollution, and although existing studies have demonstrated the susceptibility of freshwater biota to ingestion, translocation, and trophic transfer, specific challenges pertaining to methodological standardization remain largely unresolved, particularly with respect to isolating, characterizing, and assessing MPs. Here, a critical review is performed outlining the challenges and limitations currently faced by freshwater MP researchers, which may well apply across the MP research spectrum. Recommendations are provided for methodological standardization, particularly in MP characterization, quality assurance, and quality control (QA/QC) procedures as well as reporting. Considerations for the assessment of MPs in freshwater biota as a means of improving comparisons between studies are discussed. Technological advancements, including the improvement of laboratory infrastructure for identifying MPs within the smaller size range as well as methodological standardization are essential in providing policy makers with tools and measures necessary to determine the distribution of MPs within freshwater ecosystems, while also allowing for comparability and providing compliance for future monitoring requirements.

Keywords: analytical methods; biomonitoring; invertebrates; plastics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Woodward G., Hildrew A. G., Freshwater Biol. 2002, 47, 777.
    1. Baron J. S., Poff N., Water Resour. Update 2004, 127, 52.
    1. Vannote R. L., Minshall G. W., Cummins K. W., Sedell J. R., Cushing C. E., Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1980, 37, 130.
    1. Riley W. D., Potter E. C., Biggs J., Collins A. L., Jarvie H. P., Jones J. I., Kelly‐Quinn M., Ormerod S. J., Sear D. A., Wilby R. L., Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 645, 1598. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mahon A. M., Officer R., Nash R., O'Connor I., Environmental Protection Agency, Wexford, Ireland: 2017.

LinkOut - more resources