Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jul 15:13:861493.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.861493. eCollection 2022.

Advances on Self-Regulation Models: A New Research Agenda Through the SR vs ER Behavior Theory in Different Psychology Contexts

Affiliations
Review

Advances on Self-Regulation Models: A New Research Agenda Through the SR vs ER Behavior Theory in Different Psychology Contexts

Jesús de la Fuente et al. Front Psychol. .

Erratum in

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to demonstrate how Bandura's Social Cognitive Theory (1986) influenced the development of several complementary models of the construct of Self-Regulation. Building on the foundation of Self-Determination Theory, SDT (2000), and Zimmerman's Self-Regulation Theory, SR (2001), with their assumptions, contributions, goddesses, and limitations, we come to the Self- vs. External Regulatory Theory, SR-ER (2021). Finally, we integrate recent evidence demonstrating the explanatory adequacy of the SR vs. ER model for different psychological constructions in different settings related to education, health, clinical practice and social work. Complementary, a new theoretical and empirical research agenda is presented, to continue testing the adequacy of SR vs. ER assumptions, and to better understand the behavioral variability of the different constructs studied.

Keywords: Albert Bandura; self- vs. external regulation; self-determination; self-regulation; social cognitive theory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Graphic representation of regulation types: SR, Self-regulation; NR, Non-regulation; DR, Dys-Regulation. The X axis represents the degree of regulation (high-medium-low), while the Y axis shows directionality (+1, 0, −1).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Graphic representation of external regulation types: ER, External Regulation; ENR, External Non-regulation; EDR, External Dys-Regulation. The X axis represents the degree of external regulation (high-medium-low), while the Y axis shows the directionality of the external regulation (+1, 0, −1).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams N., Little T. D., Ryan R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory. In M. L. Wehmeyer, K. A. Shogren, T. D. Little and S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Development of Self-Determination Through the Life-Course. Cham, Swirtzerland: Springer. p. 47–54. 10.1007/978-94-024-1042-6_4 - DOI
    1. Almukhambetova A., Hernández-Torrano D. (2020). Gifted students' adjustment and underachievement in university: An exploration from the self-determination theory perspective. Gifted Child Quart. 64, 117–131. 10.1177/0016986220905525 - DOI
    1. Amate-Romera J., de la Fuente J. (2021). Relationships between test anxiety, self-regulation and strategies for coping with stress, in professional examination candidates. Ann. Psychol. 37, 276–286. 10.6018/analesps.411131 - DOI
    1. Balaguer A., Benítez E., de la Fuente J., Osorio A. (2021). Maternal and paternal parenting styles as a whole: validation of the simple form of the Parenting Style Evaluation Scale. Ann. Psychol. 37, 77–87 10.6018/analesps.408171 - DOI
    1. Balk Y. A., Englert C. (2020). Recovery self-regulation in sport: Theory, research, and practice. Int. J. Sports Sci. Coach. 15, 273–281. 10.1177/1747954119897528 - DOI