Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 13:12:932337.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.932337. eCollection 2022.

Molecular Heterogeneity in Pediatric Malignant Rhabdoid Tumors in Patients With Multi-Organ Involvement

Affiliations

Molecular Heterogeneity in Pediatric Malignant Rhabdoid Tumors in Patients With Multi-Organ Involvement

Katherine E Miller et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Rhabdoid tumors (RTs) of the brain (atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor; AT/RT) and extracranial sites (most often the kidney; RTK) are malignant tumors predominantly occurring in children, frequently those with SMARCB1 germline alterations. Here we present data from seven RTs from three pediatric patients who all had multi-organ involvement. The tumors were analyzed using a multimodal molecular approach, which included exome sequencing of tumor and germline comparator and RNA sequencing and DNA array-based methylation profiling of tumors. SMARCB1 germline alterations were identified in all patients and in all tumors. We observed a second hit in SMARCB1 via chr22 loss of heterozygosity. By methylation profiling, all tumors were classified as rhabdoid tumors with a corresponding subclassification within the MYC, TYR, or SHH AT/RT subgroups. Using RNA-seq gene expression clustering, we recapitulated the classification of known AT/RT subgroups. Synchronous brain and kidney tumors from the same patient showed different patterns of either copy number variants, single-nucleotide variants, and/or genome-wide DNA methylation, suggestive of non-clonal origin. Furthermore, we demonstrated that a lung and abdominal metastasis from two patients shared overlapping molecular features with the patient's primary kidney tumor, indicating the likely origin of the metastasis. In addition to the SMARCB1 events, we identified other whole-chromosome events and single-nucleotide variants in tumors, but none were found to be prognostic, diagnostic, or offer therapeutic potential for rhabdoid tumors. While our findings are of biological interest, there may also be clinical value in comprehensive molecular profiling in patients with multiple rhabdoid tumors, particularly given the potential prognostic and therapeutic implications for different rhabdoid tumor subgroups demonstrated in recent clinical trials and other large cohort studies.

Keywords: DNA methylation array; SMARCB1; atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (AT/RT); malignant rhabdoid tumor (MRT); next-generation sequencing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
–3Clonality analysis. River plots showing the composition of clones in multiple tumor samples plus matched normal blood (germline) sample. Vertical lines indicate a sample, labeled on the X-axis. Colored circles indicate the origins of a clone from a single cell, either of the germline (black) or a preceding clone. Colored outlines show the cellularity of clones (Y-axis) in each sample. The percentages shown (in white or black text) indicate the cellularity of a tumor clone in each sample that was identified, excluding the cells of any descendant clones. Clone percentages sum up to the total tumor cellularity of a sample. The samples are arranged to most clearly visualize clonal descent but do not represent a formal time-series. The copy number variants, loss-of-heterozygosity events, and single-nucleotide variants identified in the tumor samples as well as relevant germline predisposition variants are listed on the right and colored by which clone they belong to.
Figure 2
Figure 2
River plots show the composition of clones in multiple tumor samples plus matched normal blood (germline) sample. Vertical lines indicate a sample, labeled on the X-axis. Colored circles indicate the origins of a clone from a single cell, either of the germline (black) or a preceding clone. Colored outlines show the cellularity of clones (Y-axis) in each sample. Percentages shown (in white or black text) indicate the cellularity of a tumor clone in each sample that was identified, excluding the cells of any descendant clones. Clone percentages sum to the total tumor cellularity of a sample. Samples are arranged to most clearly visualize clonal descent but do not represent a formal time-series. Copy number variants (CNVs), loss-of-heterozygosity events (LOH), and single nucleotide variants (SNVs) identified in the tumor samples, as well as relevant germline predisposition variants, are listed on the right and colored by which clone they belong to.
Figure 3
Figure 3
River plots show the composition of clones in multiple tumor samples plus matched normal blood (germline) sample. Vertical lines indicate a sample, labeled on the X-axis. Colored circles indicate the origins of a clone from a single cell, either of the germline (black) or a preceding clone. Colored outlines show the cellularity of clones (Y-axis) in each sample. Percentages shown (in white or black text) indicate the cellularity of a tumor clone in each sample that was identified, excluding the cells of any descendant clones. Clone percentages sum to the total tumor cellularity of a sample. Samples are arranged to most clearly visualize clonal descent but do not represent a formal time-series. Copy number variants (CNVs), loss-of-heterozygosity events (LOH), and single nucleotide variants (SNVs) identified in the tumor samples, as well as relevant germline predisposition variants, are listed on the right and colored by which clone they belong to.

References

    1. Ostrom QT, Chen Y P, Ondracek A, Farah P, Gittleman H, et al. The Descriptive Epidemiology of Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumors in the United States, 2001-2010. Neuro Oncol (2014) 16(10):1392–9. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nou090 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brennan B, Stiller C, Bourdeaut F. Extracranial Rhabdoid Tumours: What We Have Learned So Far and Future Directions. Lancet Oncol (2013) 14(8):e329–36. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70088-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shan Y, Cai J, Han Y, Xie C, Gao H, Zhang L, et al. An Analysis of the Diagnosis, Clinical Characteristics, Treatment, and Survival Outcomes of 36 Extracranial Malignant Rhabdoid Tumor Patients. Transl Pediatr (2021) 10(6):1598–609. doi: 10.21037/tp-20-459 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cai W, Liu X, Ge W, Wu D, Xu J, Bai R, et al. Factors Affecting the Outcomes of Patients With Malignant Rhabdoid Tumors: A Population-Based Study. Int J Med Sci (2021) 18(4):911–20. doi: 10.7150/ijms.51186 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pai Panandiker AS, Merchant TE, Beltran C, Wu S, Sharma S, Boop FA, et al. Sequencing of Local Therapy Affects the Pattern of Treatment Failure and Survival in Children With Atypical Teratoid Rhabdoid Tumors of the Central Nervous System. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2012) 82(5):1756–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.02.059 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources