Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 25:11:e61.
doi: 10.1017/jns.2022.57. eCollection 2022.

Low socioeconomic status predicts vitamin D status in a cross-section of Irish children

Affiliations

Low socioeconomic status predicts vitamin D status in a cross-section of Irish children

Helena Scully et al. J Nutr Sci. .

Abstract

Vitamin D is essential for bone and muscle health with adequate status in childhood crucial for normal skeletal development. We aimed to investigate vitamin D status in a convenience sample (n = 1226) of Irish children (aged 1-17 years) who had serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) tested by request of their GP at a Dublin Hospital between 2014 and 2020. We examined predictors including age, sex, season and socioeconomic status (SES). Vitamin D deficiency (<30 nmol/l) was prevalent affecting 23 % and was more common in disadvantaged areas (34 %) and in those aged >12 v. ≤12 years (24 % v. 16 %, P = 0⋅033). The greatest predictor was SES (disadvantaged v. affluent, OR 2⋅18, CI 1⋅34, 3⋅53, P = 0⋅002), followed by female sex (OR 1⋅57, CI 1⋅15, 2⋅14, P = 0⋅005) and winter season (October to February, OR 1⋅40, CI 1⋅07, 1⋅84, P = 0⋅015). A quarter of our sample of children were deficient, rising to one-third in those in disadvantaged areas. Females and those aged over 12 years had a higher prevalence of deficiency. Public health strategies to improve vitamin D status in Irish children, including systematic food fortification may need to be considered to address this issue.

Keywords: 25(OH)D; Childhood; Ireland; Socioeconomic status; Vitamin D; Vitamin D deficiency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Vitamin D status by sex. *Indicates significance (P < 0⋅05) analysed by χ2. Winter (October–February); Summer (March–September).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Vitamin D status by age. *Indicates significance (P < 0⋅05) analysed by χ2. Winter (October–February); Summer (March–September).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Vitamin D status by socioeconomic status.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (2016) SACN Vitamin D and Health Report. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/groups/scientific-advisory-committee-on-nu... (accessed 25 March 2020).
    1. Food Safety Authority of Ireland (FSAI) (2020) Scientific Recommendations for Food-Based Dietary Guidelines for 1 to 5 Year-Olds in Ireland (accessed 7 June 2022).
    1. Goldacre M, Hall N & Yeates DG (2014) Hospitalisation for children with rickets in England: a historical perspective. Lancet 383, 597–598. - PubMed
    1. Julies P, Lynn RM, Pall K, et al. (2020) Nutritional rickets under 16 years: UK surveillance results. Arch Dis Child 105, 587–592. - PubMed
    1. Weaver CM, Gordon CM, Janz KF, et al. (2016) The National Osteoporosis Foundation's position statement on peak bone mass development and lifestyle factors: a systematic review and implementation recommendations. Osteoporos Int 27, 1281–1386. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types