Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb;91(1):145-166.
doi: 10.1111/prd.12464. Epub 2022 Aug 1.

Minimal invasiveness in the transcrestal elevation of the maxillary sinus floor: A systematic review

Affiliations

Minimal invasiveness in the transcrestal elevation of the maxillary sinus floor: A systematic review

Roberto Farina et al. Periodontol 2000. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

In the attempt to reduce the invasiveness of a transcrestal sinus floor elevation procedure, different aspects must be considered; that is, the minimization of intra- and postsurgery morbidity, the reduction of treatment time, and the simplification/elimination of the reconstructive technology. Within this context, a systematic literature search was performed for controlled clinical trials evaluating the impact of one or more of these aspects on transcrestal sinus floor elevation invasiveness. Nineteen articles (15 studies) were included. Overall, the results confirmed that transcrestal sinus floor elevation is a minimally invasive and effective option for bone augmentation in the edentulous, atrophic posterior maxilla. By using powered instruments rather than manual osteotomes and hand mallet, the invasiveness of transcrestal sinus floor elevation can be further reduced without affecting its clinical effectiveness. To impact effectively on morbidity, the key elements to consider when selecting instruments for transcrestal sinus floor elevation are (a) their availability as a standardized sequence, to be adapted on predetermined residual bone height, and (b) the possibility to control pressure (eg, with screwable osteotomes) and/or instrument excursion (eg, with stop devices) to fracture the maxillary sinus floor. Among powered instruments, a standardized sequence of drills incorporating a trephine drill seem to be particularly indicated, due to reduced chair time, high tolerability for the patient, and the possibility to isolate a bone core to implement histomorphometric outcomes. At molar extraction sites with an interradicular septum characterized by a height of at least 4 mm, immediate transcrestal sinus floor elevation and implant placement can be considered a valid option to shorten treatment time.

Keywords: alveolar process; bone regeneration; bone resorption; dental implants; maxillary sinus; minimally invasive; surgical procedures.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Tatum OH. Lecture presented to Alabama Implant Study Group. 1977.
    1. Tatum H Jr. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin N Am. 1986;30(2):207-229.
    1. Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique. Compendium. 1994;15(2):152 154-6, 158 passim; quiz 162.
    1. Summers RB. The osteotome technique: part 3-less invasive methods of elevating the sinus floor. Compendium. 1994;15(6):698 700, 702-4 passim; quiz 710.
    1. Trombelli L, Farina R, Franceschetti G, et al. Sinus augmentation-the transcrestal approach. In: Artzi Z, ed. Bone Augmentation by Anatomical Region: Techniques & Decision Making. Wiley Blackwell; 2020;chapter 14:255-281.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources