Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul:138:212948.
doi: 10.1016/j.bioadv.2022.212948. Epub 2022 May 29.

The effect of blending poly (l-lactic acid) on in vivo performance of 3D-printed poly(l-lactide-co-caprolactone)/PLLA scaffolds

Affiliations

The effect of blending poly (l-lactic acid) on in vivo performance of 3D-printed poly(l-lactide-co-caprolactone)/PLLA scaffolds

Ruiping Duan et al. Biomater Adv. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Blending poly (l-lactic acid, PLLA) with poly (l-lactide-co-caprolactone, PLCL) is an effective strategy for developing new PLCL/PLLA blend based biomaterials. However, the effect of PLLA on in vivo performance of PLCL/PLLA blends is unclear yet. To address this issue, in this study, the effect of PLLA on in vivo biodegradability and biocompatibility of 3D-printed scaffolds of PLCL/PLLA blend was investigated. Three kinds of different 3D-printed PLCL/PLLA scaffolds using different blends with different mass ratios of the polymers, were prepared and implanted subcutaneously. The shrinkage and tissue responses were monitored by ultrasonography after the implantation. 2 months post-operation, the in vivo performances of the scaffolds were investigated histologically. All scaffolds showed good biocompatibility and allowed fast tissues ingrowth, however PLCL50/PLLA50 scaffold with the highest PLLA ratio induced the thickest the fibrous capsule surrounding the scaffolds and highest inflammatory scores. Furthermore, it was found that the fine porous structures of all scaffolds were well maintained, indicating the 3D-printed scaffolds were degraded through a surface erosion but not bulk erosion way. However, different scaffolds showed different shrinkage and degradation ratios, and PLCL50/PLLA50 scaffold resulted in a significant shrinkage, while PLCL90/PLLA10 scaffold showed the better structural stability. Therefore, PLLA at blending different ratio had different effects on the in vivo performance of 3D-printed PLCL/PLLA scaffolds. Particularly, PLCL/PLLA scaffolds blending with low ratio of PLLA, such as PLCL90/PLLA10 scaffold showed better application potential in tissue engineering. Our findings provide a new insight on the rational design, constrcution and application of the 3D-printed PLCL/PLLA scaffolds.

Keywords: 3D printing; Biocompatibility; Blend of poly(l-lactide-co-caprolactone, PLCL) and poly(l-lactic acid, PLLA); Degradation; Tissue engineering scaffold.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources