Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul;48(4):287-293.
doi: 10.5152/TJU.2022.22076.

What Is Your Choice for Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Metastatic Prostate Carcinoma: Surgical or Medical?

Affiliations

What Is Your Choice for Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Metastatic Prostate Carcinoma: Surgical or Medical?

Huseyin Salih Semiz et al. Turk J Urol. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: At the time of diagnosis, approximately 16.5% of prostate cancer patients are metastatic. The main framework of metastatic prostate cancer treatment is androgen deprivation therapy, which is performed surgically or medically. The aim of this study is to evaluate the attitudes of medical oncologists and urologists about orchiectomy as androgen deprivation therapy.

Material and methods: A total of 387 physicians working in the Departments of Urology (n=217) and Medical Oncology (n=170) were included in this descriptive study. Data were collected through an electronic survey.

Results: Only 7.5% of participants indicated that they offered surgical castration to their patients. Urologists preferred surgical castration more than oncologists for the treatment of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate carcinoma (P=.003). The reasons why medical oncologists preferred surgical castration less are that it is an invasive procedure, has risk of morbidity and mortality, high cost of hospitalization, and may cause deterioration of the patient's body image (P < .05).

Conclusion: This study showed that physicians were less likely to perform orchiectomy as an androgen deprivation therapy. Although the most important reason for this is the patient preference, the biased presentation of treatment options to patients, the lack of knowledge of physicians about orchiectomy, and the effect of the pharmaceutical industry should also be kept in mind.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL.et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA A Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209 249. 10.3322/caac.21660) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zorlu F, Zorlu R, Divrik RT, Eser S, Yorukoglu K. Prostate cancer incidence in Turkey: an epideiological study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(21):9125 9130. 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.21.9125) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M.et al., eds. SEER Cancer Statistics Review. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. 1975-2018. https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2018/, based on November 2020 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2021.
    1. Teo MY, Rathkopf DE, Kantoff P. Treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Annu Rev Med. 2019;70:479 499. 10.1146/annurev-med-051517-011947) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crawford ED, Hou AH.ed. The role of LHRH antagonists in the treatment of prostate cancer. Oncology (Williston Park). 2009;23(7):626 630. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources