An evaluation of readability and understandability of online education materials for breast cancer survivors
- PMID: 35913680
- DOI: 10.1007/s11764-022-01240-w
An evaluation of readability and understandability of online education materials for breast cancer survivors
Abstract
Purpose: We aimed to determine the availability of existing web-based educational materials on breast cancer survivorship and assess their readability and understandability.
Methods: We identified materials eligible for review in two ways: (1) reviews of websites of major cancer-related organizations (e.g., American Cancer Society); (2) Google searches for breast cancer survivorship, breast cancer, breast cancer follow-up care, and cancer survivorship. We measured Flesch-Kincaid and New Dale Readability of existing breast cancer and breast cancer survivorship materials. Readability grade levels 5 to 8 were considered ideal to acceptable. We used the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) to measure the understandability of 53 videos and 152 written materials, such as booklets and manuals. A resource was considered understandable and/or actionable if it scored ≥ 70% on either the understandability section or the actionability section of the PEMAT.
Results: We identified a total of 205 existing materials including brochures, booklets, facts sheets, websites, and videos in English. The average Flesch-Kincaid grade score of written educational materials was 9.7 (range 3.5-16.4), which translates to a 9th grade reading level. According to the New Dale-Chall readability assessment, most of the materials were in the 9 to 10 grade level range. The average PEMAT score was 88.6% (range 56-100%).
Conclusion: Patient educational materials are available online as printable, written materials, and videos and they focus on a wide selection of survivorship-related topics. Most of the breast cancer educational materials that are available online were above an 8th grade reading level. The PEMAT results, however, suggest that materials are easy to understand regarding word choice and style, use of numbers, organization, layout and design, and use of visual aids.
Implications for cancer survivors: Understandable patient education materials are essential for guiding breast cancer survivors towards improving their health outcomes and optimizing their quality of life.
Keywords: Breast Cancer; Breast cancer survivor; Cancer survivor; Patient education; Survivorship.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
What's in Between the Lines: Assessing the Readability, Understandability, and Actionability in Breast Cancer Survivorship Print Materials.J Cancer Educ. 2022 Oct;37(5):1532-1539. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-02003-4. Epub 2021 Apr 6. J Cancer Educ. 2022. PMID: 33822316 Free PMC article.
-
Health Literacy in Shoulder Arthroscopy: A Quantitative Assessment of the Understandability and Readability of Online Patient Education Material.Iowa Orthop J. 2024;44(1):151-158. Iowa Orthop J. 2024. PMID: 38919367 Free PMC article.
-
Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.Iowa Orthop J. 2021;41(1):61-67. Iowa Orthop J. 2021. PMID: 34552405 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating Readability, Understandability, and Actionability of Online Printable Patient Education Materials for Cholesterol Management: A Systematic Review.J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Apr 16;13(8):e030140. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030140. Epub 2024 Apr 3. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024. PMID: 38567668 Free PMC article.
-
Readability assessment of patient educational materials for pediatric spinal conditions from top academic orthopedic institutions.J Child Orthop. 2023 May 16;17(3):284-290. doi: 10.1177/18632521231156435. eCollection 2023 Jun. J Child Orthop. 2023. PMID: 37288046 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Advocate-BREAST: advocates and patients' advice to enhance breast cancer care delivery, patient experience and patient centered research by 2025.Arch Public Health. 2024 Aug 7;82(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01351-z. Arch Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39113124 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the Accuracy, Reliability, Consistency, and Readability of Different Large Language Models in Restorative Dentistry.J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025 Jul;37(7):1740-1752. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13447. Epub 2025 Mar 2. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025. PMID: 40025833 Free PMC article.
-
Financial toxicity among pediatric oncology families during therapy and early survivorship: a qualitative analysis.Support Care Cancer. 2024 Dec 17;33(1):36. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-09093-y. Support Care Cancer. 2024. PMID: 39688693
-
The Deadly Details: How Clear and Complete Are Publicly Available Sources of Human Rabies Information?Trop Med Infect Dis. 2025 Jan 7;10(1):16. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed10010016. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2025. PMID: 39852667 Free PMC article.
-
Financial toxicity following surgical treatment for colorectal cancer: a cross-sectional study.Support Care Cancer. 2023 Jan 11;31(2):110. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07572-8. Support Care Cancer. 2023. PMID: 36629938 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Health Literacy. 2019; Available from: https://www.hrsa.gov/about/organization/bureaus/ohe/health-literacy/inde...
-
- Kutner M, Greenberg E, Jin Y, Paulsen C. The health literacy of America’s adults: results from the 2003 national assessment of adult literacy. Natl Center Educ Stat. 2006;483:1–76.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical