Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 1;17(8):e0272422.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272422. eCollection 2022.

Self-reported changes in aggressive driving within the past five years, and during COVID-19

Amanda N Stephens  1 , Steven Trawley  2 , Justin Ispanovic  2 , Sophie Lowrie  2
Affiliations

Self-reported changes in aggressive driving within the past five years, and during COVID-19

Amanda N Stephens et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Aggressive driving is a significant road safety problem and is likely to get worse as the situations that provoke aggression become more prevalent in the road network (e.g. as traffic volumes and density increase and the grey fleet expands). In addition, driver frustration and stress, also recognised as triggers for aggression, are likely to stay high because of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated burdens, leading to increased aggression. However, although drivers report that other drivers are becoming more aggressive, self-report data suggests that the prevalence of aggression has not changed over time. This may be due to the methods used to define and measure aggression. This study sought to clarify whether self-reported aggression has increased over a five-year period and across three different types of aggression: verbal aggression, aggressive use of the vehicle and personal physical aggression. The influence of COVID-19 lockdowns on own and others' driving styles was also investigated. A total of 774 drivers (males = 66.5%, mean age = 48.7; SD = 13.9) who had been licensed for at least five years (M = 30.6, SD = 14.3), responded to an online survey and provided retrospective frequencies for their current aggression (considered pre-COVID-19 lockdowns) and five years prior. Two open ended questions were included to understand perceived changes in driving styles (own and others) during the COVID-19 pandemic. One third (33%) of drivers believed they were more aggressive now than five years ago but 61% of the sample believed other drivers were more aggressive now than five years ago. Logistic regression analyses on changes in self-reported aggression (same or decreased vs increased) showed the main factor associated with increases in aggressive driving was the perception that other drivers' aggression had increased. Further, almost half the sample (47%) reported that other drivers had become riskier and more dangerous during, and soon after, the COVID-19 lockdowns. These results show that the driving environment is seen as becoming more aggressive, both gradually and as a direct result of COVID-19 lockdowns. The data indicate that this perceived increase in aggression is likely to provoke higher levels of aggression in some drivers. Campaigns to reduce aggression on the roads need to focus on changing road culture and improving interactions, or perceived interactions, among road users.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Summary of themes that emerged from coding the text responses to questions regarding changes in aggressive driving over time.
No specific time frame was provided for this question. Each theme is ordered by frequency and is presented with an illustrative quote.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Summary of themes that emerged from coding the text responses to questions regarding changes in driving during the COVID-19 lockdown (regarding oneself and others).
Each theme is ordered by frequency and is presented with an illustrative quote.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Dingus T. A., Guo F., Lee S., Antin J. F., Perez M., Buchanan-King M., et al. (2016). Driver crash risk factors and prevalence evaluation using naturalistic driving data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(10), 2636–2641. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1513271113 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sullman M. J., & Stephens A. N. (2021). Driver aggression and anger. In Vickerman Roger (eds.) International Encyclopedia of Transportation. Vol 7, pp. 121–129. UK: Elsevier Ltd. 10.1016/B978-0-08-102671-7.10670-0. - DOI
    1. Suhr K. A., & Nesbit S. M. (2013). Dwelling on ‘Road Rage’: The effects of trait rumination on aggressive driving. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 21, 207–218. 10.1016/j.trf.2013.10.001. - DOI
    1. Deffenbacher J. L., Lynch R. S., Oetting E. R., & Swaim R. C. (2002). The Driving Anger Expression Inventory: A measure of how people express their anger on the road. Behavior Research Therapy, 40(6), 717–737. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(01)00063-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Deffenbacher J. L., Stephens A., & Sullman M. J. (2016). Driving anger as a psychological construct: Twenty years of research using the Driving Anger Scale. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology, 42, 236–247. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2015.10.021 - DOI