Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Aug 1;12(1):13189.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17410-w.

Detection tools for prediction and identification of adverse drug reactions in older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Dewi Susanti Atmaja  1   2 , Yulistiani  3 , Suharjono  3 , Elida Zairina  4   5   6
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Detection tools for prediction and identification of adverse drug reactions in older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Dewi Susanti Atmaja et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Tools to accurately predict and detect adverse drug reactions (ADR) in elderly patients have not been developed. We aimed to identify and evaluate reports on tools that predict and detect ADR in elderly patients (≥ 60 years). In this review, we followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Databases were searched until January 2022 using key terms "elderly," "adverse drug reaction," and "detection instruments." Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria, and they examined assorted interventions: STOPP/START version 1/2 (n = 10), Beers Criteria 2012 or 2015 (n = 4), Systematic Tool to Reduce Inappropriate Prescribing (STRIP) (n = 2), Tool to Reduce Inappropriate Medications (TRIM) (n = 1), Medication Risk Score (MERIS) (n = 1), Computerized alert systems (n = 1), and Norwegian General Practice-Nursing Home criteria (n = 1). The interventions affected the number of potential prescription omissions (OR, 0.50 [0.37-0.69]; p < 0.0001; four studies). No apparent reduction in the number of drug interactions within 2 months (OR, 0.84 [0.70-1.02]; p = 0.08; two studies) and mortality (OR, 0.92 [0.76-1.12]; p = 0.41; three studies) was observed. In conclusion, there is no definitive and validated assessment tool for detecting and predicting ADR in elderly patients. Thus, more research on refining existing tools or developing new ones is warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram for study selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Risk of bias assessment.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) “Meta-analysis” of the effect of interventions on A: number of reducing drug interactions within 2 months; (b) number of potential prescription omission (PPO).
Figure 4
Figure 4
A “meta-analysis” of the effect of interventions on mortality (all-cause).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. (EMA) EMA. Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP). Definition. 2017(United Kingdom): Annex I.
    1. Food and Drug Administration Department of Health and Human Services, Chapter I. United States and America. Subchapter D—Drugs for human use. FDA. In: FDA; 2018.
    1. Barclay K, Frasetto A, Robb J, Mandel ED. Polypharmacy in the elderly: How to reduce adverse drug events. Clin. Rev. 2018;28:38–44.
    1. Andersen LV, Poulsen BK, Poulsen MH, Krogh ML. The ESC Handbook on Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy. 2. Oxford University Press; 2019. Major drug interactions; pp. 387–410.
    1. Schoenmakers TW, Teichert M, Wensing M, de Smet PA. Evaluation of potentially drug-related patient-reported common symptoms assessed during clinical medication reviews: A cross-sectional observational study. Drug Saf. 2017;40:419–430. doi: 10.1007/s40264-017-0504-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms