Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb;32(2):307-329.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03185-0. Epub 2022 Aug 1.

Measurement properties of the EQ-5D in populations with a mean age of ≥ 75 years: a systematic review

Sophie Gottschalk  1 , Hans-Helmut König  2 , Mona Nejad  2 , Judith Dams  2
Affiliations

Measurement properties of the EQ-5D in populations with a mean age of ≥ 75 years: a systematic review

Sophie Gottschalk et al. Qual Life Res. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: Healthcare interventions for middle-old and oldest-old individuals are often (economically) evaluated using the EQ-5D to measure health-related quality of life (HrQoL). This requires sufficient measurement properties of the EQ-5D. Therefore, the current study aimed to systematically review studies assessing the measurement properties of the EQ-5D in this population.

Methods: The databases PubMed, Cochrane library, Web of Science, Embase, and EconLit were searched for studies providing empirical evidence of reliability, validity, and/or responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in samples with a mean age ≥ 75 years. Studies were selected by two independent reviewers, and the methodological quality was assessed using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist. Results were rated against updated criteria for good measurement properties (sufficient, insufficient, inconsistent, indeterminate). The evidence was summarized, and the quality of evidence was graded using a modified GRADE approach.

Results: For both EQ-5D versions, high-quality evidence for sufficient convergent validity was found. Known-groups validity was sufficient for the EQ-5D-5L (high-quality evidence), whereas the results were inconsistent for the EQ-5D-3L. Results regarding the reliability were inconsistent (EQ-5D-3L) or entirely lacking (EQ-5D-5L). Responsiveness based on correlations of change scores with instruments measuring related/similar constructs was insufficient for the EQ-5D-3L (high-quality evidence). For the EQ-5D-5L, the available evidence on responsiveness to change in (Hr)QoL instruments was limited.

Conclusion: Since the responsiveness of the EQ-5D in a population of middle-old and oldest-old individuals was questionable, either using additional instruments or considering the use of an alternative, more comprehensive instrument of (Hr)QoL might be advisable, especially for economic evaluations.

Keywords: EQ-5D; Older population; Oldest-old population; Psychometric properties; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Selection process of included studies
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, & Population Division . World population prospects 2019. Demographic Profiles; 2019.
    1. Janssen MF, Szende A, Cabases J, Ramos-Goñi JM, Vilagut G, König HH. Population norms for the EQ-5D-3L: A cross-country analysis of population surveys for 20 countries. The European Journal of Health Economics. 2019;20(2):205–216. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0955-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marten O, Greiner W. EQ-5D-5L reference values for the German general elderly population. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2021;19(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01719-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. EuroQol Group EuroQol–a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16(3):199–208. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kennedy-Martin M, Slaap B, Herdman M, van Reenen M, Kennedy-Martin T, Greiner W, Busschbach J, Boye KS. Which multi-attribute utility instruments are recommended for use in cost-utility analysis? A review of national health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines. The European Journal of Health Economics. 2020;21(8):1245–1257. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01195-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources