Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep;36(8):1186-1206.
doi: 10.1177/02692163221105599. Epub 2022 Aug 1.

Measuring quality of dying, death and end-of-life care for children and young people: A scoping review of available tools

Affiliations

Measuring quality of dying, death and end-of-life care for children and young people: A scoping review of available tools

Catriona R Mayland et al. Palliat Med. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The circumstances and care provided at the end of a child's life have a profound impact on family members. Although assessing experiences and outcomes during this time is challenging, healthcare professionals have a responsibility to ensure high quality of care is provided.

Aim: To identify available tools which measure the quality of dying, death and end-of-life care for children and young people; describe the content, and data on validity and reliability of existing tools.

Design: Scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework.

Data sources: Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO) and grey literature were searched for studies published in English (January 2000-June 2021). A review of reference lists and citation searching was also undertaken. Tools needed to include a focus on the 'dying' phase of illness (defined as the last month of life).

Results: From 2078 articles, a total of 18 studies, reporting on 11 tools were identified. All tools were completed by primary caregivers or healthcare professionals as 'proxy' assessments; all except one was undertaken after death. Question items about quality of life and preparation for death were found in all tools; items relating to cultural aspects of care, grief and financial costs were less common. Only 6/11 had undergone psychometric testing within a paediatric palliative care setting.

Conclusions: Future research should include ways to adapt, refine and improve existing tools. Assessing their wider application in different clinical and cultural settings and conducting further psychometric assessment represent areas of focus.

Keywords: Child; adolescent; palliative care; quality of death; quality of dying; review; terminal care; tools.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA flow diagram for the scoping review process.

References

    1. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. State of child health 1 - Mortality indicators, https://www.rcpch.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2018-05/state_of_child_healt... (2017, accessed 23 February 2022).
    1. Knaul FM, Farmer PE, Krakauer EL, et al.. Alleviating the access abyss in palliative care and pain relief-an imperative of universal health coverage: the Lancet Commission report. Lancet 2018; 391: 1391–1454. - PubMed
    1. Sanders CM. A comparison of adult bereavement in the death of a spouse, child, and parent. OMEGA-Journal of Death and Dying 1980; 10: 303–322.
    1. Gilbert KR. “We’ve had the same loss, why don’t we have the same grief?” loss and differential grief in families. Death Stud 1996; 20: 269–283.
    1. Rogers CH, Floyd FJ, Seltzer MM, et al.. Long-term effects of the death of a child on parents’ adjustment in midlife.J Fam Psychol 2008; 22: 203–211. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types