Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jul 28;14(7):e27414.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.27414. eCollection 2022 Jul.

Absolute Versus Relative Changes in Cardiac Troponins in the Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Anvesh Ravanavena  1 , Chetna Ravindra  2 , Emmanuelar O Igweonu-Nwakile  1 , Safina Ali  1 , Salomi Paul  1 , Shreyas Yakkali  1 , Sneha Teresa Selvin  1 , Sonu Thomas  1 , Viktoriya Bikeyeva  1 , Ahmed Abdullah  1 , Aleksandra Radivojevic  1 , Anas A Abu Jad  3 , Prachi Balani  1
Affiliations
Review

Absolute Versus Relative Changes in Cardiac Troponins in the Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Anvesh Ravanavena et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is one of the leading causes of death globally. Rapid diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI) will enable earlier initiation of the treatment and improve patient outcomes. Practice guidelines for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes by the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) had listed the diagnostic performance of absolute versus relative changes in evidence gaps. We aimed to address this evidence gap by examining the diagnostic accuracy of absolute versus relative changes in cardiac troponins at various time intervals in diagnosing MI. Grey literature, conference abstracts, animal studies, and reports published before 2009 and in languages other than English were excluded. We included reports that investigated absolute or relative changes in highly sensitive cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) or sensitive/highly sensitive cardiac troponin I (s/hs-cTnI) assays after specific time intervals (1, 2, or 3 h) in patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of the acute coronary syndrome. After screening, we arranged the reports in 12 separate groups based on the variables for which the data was reported. Quality assessment of the diagnostic accuracy studies-2 (QUADAS-2) was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. The weighted summary area under the curve (AUC) was calculated for each pool. We then performed two-sided (or two-tailed) tests to compare independent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. MedCalc version 20.106 (MedCalc Software Ltd., Ostend, Belgium) was used for all statistical analysis. We included eight reports with 23,450 patients in the meta-analysis. Weighted summary estimates and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI) under random-effects model for ROC-AUC are as follows: absolute hs-cTnI at 1 h - 0.94 (95% CI: 0.922 to 0.959, p < 0.001); absolute hs-cTnT at 1 h - 0.921 (95% CI: 0.902 to 0.941, p < 0.001); absolute s/hs-cTnI at 2 h - 0.953 (95% CI: 0.926 to 0.980, p < 0.001); absolute hs-cTnT at 2 h 0.951 (95% CI: 0.940 to 0.962, p < 0.001); relative hs-cTnT at 2 h - 0.818 (95% CI: 0.733 to 0.903, p < 0.001); relative s/hs-cTnI at 2 h - 0.762 (95% CI: 0.726 to 0.798, p < 0.001); absolute hs-cTnI at 3 h - 0.967 (95% CI: 0.95 to 0.984, p < 0.001); absolute hs-cTnT at 3 h - 0.959 (95% CI: 0.950 to 0.968, p < 0.001); and relative hs-cTnT at 3 h - 0.926 (95% CI: 0.907 to 0.945, p < 0.001). P-values of comparison of absolute and relative changes are as follows: hs-cTnT at 1 h: <0.0001; hs-cTnI at 1 h: <0.0001; hs-cTnT at 2 h: 0.0024; s/hs-cTnI at 2 h: <0.0001; hs-cTnT at 3 h: 0.0022; and hs-cTnI at 3 h: 0.0005. Our analysis found absolute changes to be superior to relative changes in both hs-cTnT and s/hs-cTnI at 1, 2, and 3 h in the diagnosis of MI. There was no statistically significant difference in comparing s/hs-cTnI vs. hs-cTnT using absolute or relative changes at any time interval. Our findings suggest that future research investigating a potential 0 h/30 min algorithm should use absolute Δ over relative Δ. A suboptimal number of reports in the groups limited our ability to establish the robustness of the results. We did not receive any funding for this review.

Keywords: absolute change; cardiac troponin i; cardiac troponin-t; delta; high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-ctn); myocardial infarction; non-st elevation myocardial infarction; relative change.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis) flow diagram
Figure 2
Figure 2. Absolute changes in hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT at 1 h
Image credit: Authors of this study.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Absolute changes in s/hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT at 2 h
Image credit: Authors of this study.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Relative changes in s/hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT at 2 h
Image credit: Authors of this study.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Absolute changes in hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT at 3 h
Image credit: Authors of this study.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Relative changes in hs-cTnT at 3 h
Image credit: Authors of this study.
Figure 7
Figure 7. Funnel plots for absolute changes in hs-cTnI at 1 h, absolute changes in hs-cTnT at 1 h, absolute changes in s/hs-cTnI at 2 h, and absolute changes in hs-cTnT at 2 h
Image credit: Authors of this study.
Figure 8
Figure 8. Funnel plots for relative changes in s/hs-cTnI at 2 h, relative changes in hs-cTnT at 2 h, absolute changes in hs-cTnI at 3 h, absolute changes in hs-cTnT at 3 h, and relative changes in hs-cTnT at 3 h
Image credit: Authors of this study.
Figure 9
Figure 9. AUC trends over time
Image credit: Authors of this study.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. The top 10 causes of death. [ May; 2022 ];https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death 2020
    1. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018) Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA, White HD. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:2231–2264. - PubMed
    1. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:0–228. - PubMed
    1. Diagnostic value of serial measurement of cardiac markers in patients with chest pain: limited value of adding myoglobin to troponin I for exclusion of myocardial infarction. Eggers KM, Oldgren J, Nordenskjöld A, Lindahl B. Am Heart J. 2004;148:574–581. - PubMed
    1. Introduction of high-sensitivity troponin assays: impact on myocardial infarction incidence and prognosis. Reichlin T, Twerenbold R, Reiter M, et al. Am J Med. 2012;125:1205–1213. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources