Microleakage of five separated nickel-titanium rotary file systems in the apical portion of the root canal
- PMID: 35915714
- PMCID: PMC9338351
Microleakage of five separated nickel-titanium rotary file systems in the apical portion of the root canal
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of apical microleakage following the fracture of five types of nickel-titanium rotary file systems (ProTaper Universal, Mtwo, RaCe, Revo-s, HeroShaper) in the apical one-third of the canal.
Materials and methods: In this laboratory experiment, 49 mandibular premolars were collected and randomly divided into seven groups. Root canal treatment was performed by five different rotary file systems with different cross-sections. All files, except in the control groups, were scratched at the 3-mm end by a handpiece. After separation of the apical end of the file in the root canal, the apical seal was measured, using the fluid infiltration technique. Data were analyzed in SPSS, using one-way ANOVA and Tamhane's T2 tests at P < 0.05.
Results: The Hero Shaper and RaCe files showed the highest (3.14 μL/min) and the lowest (2.51 µL/min) rates of microleakage over time, respectively. There were significant differences between the Hero Shaper and RaCe files and between Hero Shaper and ProTaper files in terms of microleakage (Tamhane's T2 tests, P < 0.05).
Conclusion: The presence of a separated file and its cross-section type affects the apical microleakage.
Keywords: Nickel–titanium; root canal treatment; rotary; separation.
Copyright: © 2022 Dental Research Journal.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors of this manuscript declare that they have no conflicts of interest, real or perceived, financial or nonfinancial in this article.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Sealer penetration: effect of separated file's cross-section, taper and motion characteristics.Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Mar;25(3):1077-1084. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03404-3. Epub 2020 Jun 19. Clin Oral Investig. 2021. PMID: 32562075
-
Evaluation of apically extruded debris during the removal of canal filling material using three different Ni-Ti systems and hand files in teeth with simulated apical root resorption.Int Endod J. 2020 Mar;53(3):403-409. doi: 10.1111/iej.13234. Epub 2019 Nov 3. Int Endod J. 2020. PMID: 31605377
-
Incidence of apical crack initiation and propagation during the removal of root canal filling material with ProTaper and Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium retreatment instruments and hand files.J Endod. 2014 Jul;40(7):1009-12. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.12.020. Epub 2014 Feb 8. J Endod. 2014. PMID: 24935554
-
A Comparative SEM Investigation of Smear Layer Remaining on Dentinal Walls by Three Rotary NiTi Files with Different Cross Sectional Designs in Moderately Curved Canals.J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Mar;9(3):ZC43-7. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/11569.5710. Epub 2015 Mar 1. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015. PMID: 25954704 Free PMC article.
-
In vitro evaluation of root canal preparation with two rotary instrument systems - Pro Taper and Hero Shaper.Clujul Med. 2015;88(3):395-402. doi: 10.15386/cjmed-454. Epub 2015 Jul 1. Clujul Med. 2015. PMID: 26609276 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Mohammadi Z. Sealing ability of MTA cements as orthograde root filling materials. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatria ClÍn Integr. 2009;8:267–70.
-
- Zarei M, Barzanoni M, Esmaieli H. An in vitro evaluation of apical leakage after root canal preparation by RC prep. J Mashhad Dent Sch. 2006;30:217–24.
-
- Ingle JI, Bakland LK, Baumgartner JC. Sixth Ed. Hamilton: BC Decker Inc.; 2008. Ingle’s endodontics 6.
-
- Alapati SB, Brantley WA, Svec TA, Powers JM, Nusstein JM, Daehn GS. SEM observations of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments that separated during clinical use. J Endod. 2005;31:40–3. - PubMed
-
- Schäfer E, Schulz-Bongert U, Tulus G. Comparison of hand stainless steel and nickel titanium rotary instrumentation: A clinical study. J Endod. 2004;30:432–5. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources