Suicide risk assessment fears, attitudes and behaviours of lifeline crisis supporters
- PMID: 35915919
- PMCID: PMC10087418
- DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13923
Suicide risk assessment fears, attitudes and behaviours of lifeline crisis supporters
Abstract
Lifeline Australia operates crisis support services through Lifeline Crisis Supporters. An integral part of their role is to conduct online suicide risk assessments with help-seekers. However, there is limited literature regarding suicide risk assessment practices for this population. This study aimed to examine how suicide prevention training, vicarious trauma and fears impacted suicide risk assessment behaviours of Lifeline Crisis Supporters. A cross-sectional survey design was used to recruit a volunteer convenience sample of 125 Lifeline Australia Crisis Supporters (75.2% females; Mage = 54.9) in 2018 to participate in an online survey. Findings revealed that those with more suicide-specific training had less risk assessment-related fears, and that fears were not related to attitudes towards suicide prevention. There was no significant relationship between vicarious trauma and amount of training or years of experience in the role. Further, participants with higher levels of vicarious trauma demonstrated significantly more negative attitudes towards suicide prevention. Overall, training appears to be a significant factor in suicide risk assessment practice behaviours of Lifeline Crisis Supporters, highlighting a need for ongoing training and support for them. This research also suggests that whilst fears exist, they do not significantly impair Lifeline Crisis Supporters' ability to undertake suicide risk assessment.
Keywords: crisis intervention; lifeline; suicide; suicide prevention; suicide risk assessment; vicarious trauma.
© 2022 The Authors. Health and Social Care in the Community published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Whilst the study received a small amount of funding from Lifeline Australia, Lifeline staff were not involved in the collection of data or the analyses of results. No authors have any conflict of interest in the collection, analysis or interpretation of data.
Similar articles
-
Help-seeker expectations and outcomes of a crisis support service: Comparison of suicide-related and non-suicide-related contacts to lifeline Australia.Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e4535-e4544. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13857. Epub 2022 Jun 8. Health Soc Care Community. 2022. PMID: 35676830 Free PMC article.
-
Establishing standards for the assessment of suicide risk among callers to the national suicide prevention lifeline.Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2007 Jun;37(3):353-65. doi: 10.1521/suli.2007.37.3.353. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2007. PMID: 17579546
-
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (Now 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline): Evaluation of Crisis Call Outcomes for Suicidal Callers.Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2025 Jun;55(3):e70020. doi: 10.1111/sltb.70020. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2025. PMID: 40405822 Free PMC article.
-
The Journey Toward 988: A Historical Perspective on Crisis Hotlines in the United States.Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2024 Sep;47(3):473-490. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2024.04.003. Epub 2024 Jun 15. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2024. PMID: 39122341 Review.
-
Crisis Lines: Current Status and Recommendations for Research and Policy.Psychiatr Serv. 2023 May 1;74(5):505-512. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220294. Epub 2022 Dec 7. Psychiatr Serv. 2023. PMID: 36475827 Review.
References
-
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare . (2021). Suicide & self‐harm monitoring data. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. https://www.aihw.gov.au/suicide‐self‐harm‐monitoring/data/suicide‐self‐h...
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical