Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep;12(9):e2645.
doi: 10.1002/brb3.2645. Epub 2022 Aug 2.

Effect of static and dynamic jaw positions on postural stability among people with blindness

Affiliations

Effect of static and dynamic jaw positions on postural stability among people with blindness

Ahmad H Alghadir et al. Brain Behav. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Background: In comparison with the people with normal sight, the mean center of gravity (COG) velocity is significantly higher among blind people. A strong relationship has been shown between jaw and neck sensorimotor and postural control. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of different static and dynamic jaw positions on postural stability among subjects with blindness.

Methods: Postural stability was measured as COG velocity in 39 blind subjects under the following five conditions: resting jaw (natural jaw position with no instructions, control), open jaw (teeth of both jaws slightly apart), clenched jaw (teeth tightly closed across each other), chewing (a standard bolus of gum at the natural palace), and tongue position (positioned behind the upper incisors) while standing on firm and foam surfaces.

Results: The mean COG velocity while standing on the firm surface during resting, open jaw position, clenched jaw position, chewing, and tongue positions were 0.54, 0.50, 0.44, 0.59, and 0.46 deg/s, respectively. The mean COG velocity while standing on the foam surface during resting, open jaw position, clenched jaw position, chewing, and tongue positions were 1.42, 1.23, 1.10, 1.14, and 1.06 deg/s, respectively. Compared to the firm surface, the COG velocity was significantly higher on the foam surface in all five conditions (p < .001). In the comparison between the conditions, there were no significant differences in either the firm or foam surface in all five conditions (p > .05).

Conclusion: People with blindness behave in the same way as sighted subjects on firm and foam surfaces. However, changes in static and dynamic jaw positions do not affect postural stability among them.

Keywords: chewing; clenching; jaw functional status; postural stability; tongue position.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Similar articles

References

    1. Acheson, J. (2010). Blindness in neurological disease: A short overview of new therapies from translational research. Current Opinion in Neurology, 23(1), 1–3. - PubMed
    1. Alghadir, A. , Zafar, H. , & Iqbal, Z. A. (2017). Effect of upright and slouch sitting postures and voluntary teeth clenching on hand grip strength in young male adults. Journal of Back Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, 30, 961–965. - PubMed
    1. Alghadir, A. , Zafar, H. , Whitney, S. L. , & Iqbal, Z. (2015). Effect of chewing on postural stability during quiet standing in healthy young males. Somatosensory & Motor Research, 32(2), 72–76. 10.3109/08990220.2014.969837 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alghadir, A. H. , Alotaibi, A. Z. , & Iqbal, Z. A. (2019). Postural stability in people with visual impairment. Brain and Behavior, 9(11), e01436. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alghadir, A. H. , Zafar, H. , & Iqbal, Z. A. (2015a). Effect of three different jaw positions on postural stability during standing. Functional Neurology, 30(1), 53–57. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources