Effect of static and dynamic jaw positions on postural stability among people with blindness
- PMID: 35916391
- PMCID: PMC9480900
- DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2645
Effect of static and dynamic jaw positions on postural stability among people with blindness
Abstract
Background: In comparison with the people with normal sight, the mean center of gravity (COG) velocity is significantly higher among blind people. A strong relationship has been shown between jaw and neck sensorimotor and postural control. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of different static and dynamic jaw positions on postural stability among subjects with blindness.
Methods: Postural stability was measured as COG velocity in 39 blind subjects under the following five conditions: resting jaw (natural jaw position with no instructions, control), open jaw (teeth of both jaws slightly apart), clenched jaw (teeth tightly closed across each other), chewing (a standard bolus of gum at the natural palace), and tongue position (positioned behind the upper incisors) while standing on firm and foam surfaces.
Results: The mean COG velocity while standing on the firm surface during resting, open jaw position, clenched jaw position, chewing, and tongue positions were 0.54, 0.50, 0.44, 0.59, and 0.46 deg/s, respectively. The mean COG velocity while standing on the foam surface during resting, open jaw position, clenched jaw position, chewing, and tongue positions were 1.42, 1.23, 1.10, 1.14, and 1.06 deg/s, respectively. Compared to the firm surface, the COG velocity was significantly higher on the foam surface in all five conditions (p < .001). In the comparison between the conditions, there were no significant differences in either the firm or foam surface in all five conditions (p > .05).
Conclusion: People with blindness behave in the same way as sighted subjects on firm and foam surfaces. However, changes in static and dynamic jaw positions do not affect postural stability among them.
Keywords: chewing; clenching; jaw functional status; postural stability; tongue position.
© 2022 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Effect of chewing on postural stability during quiet standing in healthy young males.Somatosens Mot Res. 2015;32(2):72-6. doi: 10.3109/08990220.2014.969837. Epub 2014 Oct 30. Somatosens Mot Res. 2015. PMID: 25356855
-
Effect of tongue position on postural stability during quiet standing in healthy young males.Somatosens Mot Res. 2015;32(3):183-6. doi: 10.3109/08990220.2015.1043120. Somatosens Mot Res. 2015. PMID: 26400633
-
Postural stability in people with visual impairment.Brain Behav. 2019 Nov;9(11):e01436. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1436. Epub 2019 Oct 2. Brain Behav. 2019. PMID: 31578824 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of three different jaw positions on postural stability during standing.Funct Neurol. 2015 Jan-Mar;30(1):53-7. Funct Neurol. 2015. PMID: 26329542 Free PMC article.
-
Can jaw position affect the fine motor activity of the hand during writing?Brain Behav. 2020 Dec;10(12):e01887. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1887. Epub 2020 Oct 21. Brain Behav. 2020. PMID: 33085222 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Acheson, J. (2010). Blindness in neurological disease: A short overview of new therapies from translational research. Current Opinion in Neurology, 23(1), 1–3. - PubMed
-
- Alghadir, A. , Zafar, H. , & Iqbal, Z. A. (2017). Effect of upright and slouch sitting postures and voluntary teeth clenching on hand grip strength in young male adults. Journal of Back Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, 30, 961–965. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources