Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 3:12:11009.
doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.11009.

Maternal pre-pregnancy/early-pregnancy smoking and risk of congenital heart diseases in offspring: A prospective cohort study in Central China

Affiliations

Maternal pre-pregnancy/early-pregnancy smoking and risk of congenital heart diseases in offspring: A prospective cohort study in Central China

Tingting Wang et al. J Glob Health. .

Abstract

Background: Prior studies suggested that maternal smoking before and during pregnancy could be associated with increased risks of congenital heart diseases (CHDs) in offspring. However, the results were inconsistent, and the existence of a causal relationship was not confirmed. Our study aimed to estimate the associations of maternal active and passive smoking during the pre-pregnancy/early-pregnancy period with CHDs as well as its common phenotypes in offspring.

Methods: This study was based on data from a prospective cohort study conducted in Central China. A total of 49 158 eligible pregnant women between the 8th and 14th weeks of gestation were invited to join the cohort and were planned to be followed up until 3 months postpartum. The exposure of interest was maternal smoking status, including active and passive smoking status in 3 months before pregnancy as well as in early pregnancy. Self-reported maternal smoking status was ascertained via an in-person interview after recruitment. CHDs were diagnosed by pediatric cardiologists and classified according to ICD-10. Multivariable Poisson regression models were used to estimate the relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of all CHDs and their common phenotypes associated with maternal smoking status, adjusting for potential confounding factors identified by directed acyclic graphs.

Results: CHDs were diagnosed in 564 children. After adjusting for potential confounding factors and comparing with the unexposed groups, CHDs incidence was 165% higher (adjusted RR = 2.65; 95% CI = 1.76-3.98) in offspring exposed to maternal active smoking in 3 months before pregnancy, 69% higher (adjusted-RR = 1.69; 95% CI = 1.39-2.05) in offspring exposed to maternal passive smoking in 3 months before pregnancy, 133% higher (adjusted RR = 2.33; 95% CI = 1.46-3.70) for offspring exposed to maternal active smoking in early pregnancy, and 98% higher (adjusted-RR = 1.98; 95% CI = 1.56-2.51) for offspring exposed to maternal passive smoking in early pregnancy. More specifically, the offspring exposed to maternal active smoking in early pregnancy had the highest risk of Tetralogy of Fallot (adjusted RR = 9.84; 95% CI = 2.49-38.84). These findings were recapitulated in analyses that further adjusted for other behaviour variables apart from the characteristic being assessed and were also confirmed by sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions: Our findings add to the existing body of evidence that implicates maternal pre-pregnancy/early-pregnancy smoking as a significant risk factor for CHDs and their select phenotypes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure of interest: The authors completed the ICMJE Disclosure of Interest Form (available upon request from the corresponding authors) and declare no relevant interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart illustrating the process of participant recruitment. CHDs – congenital heart diseases.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Maternal smoking status in 3 months before pregnancy and risk of CHDs and its phenotypes in offspring. A) Covariates including age, ethnicity, educational level, parity, history of adverse pregnancy outcomes, and pre-pregnancy BMI were adjusted. B) Covariates including age, ethnicity, educational level, parity, and history of adverse pregnancy outcomes were adjusted. BMI – body mass index, CHDs – congenital heart defects, RR – risk ratio.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Maternal smoking status in early pregnancy and risk of CHDs and its phenotypes in offspring. A) Covariates including age, ethnicity, educational level, model of conception, parity, history of adverse pregnancy outcomes, pre-pregnancy BMI, active smoking in 3 months before pregnancy, passive smoking in 3 months before pregnancy, and alcohol consumption in 3 months before pregnancy were adjusted. B) Covariates including age, ethnicity, educational level, model of conception, parity, history of adverse pregnancy outcomes, pre-pregnancy BMI, active smoking in 3 months before pregnancy, and passive smoking in 3 months before pregnancy were adjusted. BMI – body mass index, CHDs – congenital heart defects, RR – risk ratio.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization. Women and the Tobacco Epidemic: Challenges for the 21st Century. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
    1. Lange S, Probst C, Rehm J, Popova S.National, regional, and global prevalence of smoking during pregnancy in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6:e769-76. 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30223-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hackshaw A, Rodeck C, Boniface S.Maternal smoking in pregnancy and birth defects: a systematic review based on 173 687 malformed cases and 11.7 million controls. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:589-604. 10.1093/humupd/dmr022 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cnattingius S.The epidemiology of smoking during pregnancy: smoking prevalence, maternal characteristics, and pregnancy outcomes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004;6 Suppl 2:S125-40. 10.1080/14622200410001669187 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Salmasi G, Grady R, Jones J, McDonald SD.Environmental tobacco smoke exposure and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89:423-41. 10.3109/00016340903505748 - DOI - PubMed

Substances