Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 1;10(8):e35726.
doi: 10.2196/35726.

Harnessing the Electronic Health Care Record to Optimize Patient Safety in Primary Care: Framework for Evaluating e-Safety-Netting Tools

Affiliations

Harnessing the Electronic Health Care Record to Optimize Patient Safety in Primary Care: Framework for Evaluating e-Safety-Netting Tools

Georgia Bell Black et al. JMIR Med Inform. .

Abstract

The management of diagnostic uncertainty is part of every primary care physician's role. e-Safety-netting tools help health care professionals to manage diagnostic uncertainty. Using software in addition to verbal or paper based safety-netting methods could make diagnostic delays and errors less likely. There are an increasing number of software products that have been identified as e-safety-netting tools, particularly since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. e-Safety-netting tools can have a variety of functions, such as sending clinician alerts, facilitating administrative tasking, providing decision support, and sending reminder text messages to patients. However, these tools have not been evaluated by using robust research designs for patient safety interventions. We present an emergent framework of criteria for effective e-safety-netting tools that can be used to support the development of software. The framework is based on validated frameworks for electronic health record development and patient safety. There are currently no tools available that meet all of the criteria in the framework. We hope that the framework will stimulate clinical and public conversations about e-safety-netting tools. In the future, a validated framework would drive audits and improvements. We outline key areas for future research both in primary care and within integrated care systems.

Keywords: criteria; diagnostic; electronic health record; evaluation; framework; management; netting; optimize; patient safety; primary care; safety; software; tool; uncertainty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Neighbour R. The Inner Consultation. New York, NY: Springer; 1987.
    1. Nicholson BD, Mant D, Bankhead C. Can safety-netting improve cancer detection in patients with vague symptoms? BMJ. 2016 Nov 09;355:i5515. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5515. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Almond S, Mant D, Thompson M. Diagnostic safety-netting. Br J Gen Pract. 2009 Nov;59(568):872–874. doi: 10.3399/bjgp09X472971. https://bjgp.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=19861036 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hirst Y, Lim AWW. Acceptability of text messages for safety netting patients with low-risk cancer symptoms: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract. 2018 May;68(670):e333–e341. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X695741. https://bjgp.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=29581127 bjgp18X695741 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen C, Crowley R. Improving assessment of children with suspected respiratory tract infection in general practice. BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Apr 08;8(2):e000450. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000450. https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/lookup/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=31206053 bmjoq-2018-000450 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources