Bone filling decreases donor site morbidity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts
- PMID: 35916963
- DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04572-5
Bone filling decreases donor site morbidity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts
Abstract
Purpose: Bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autograft remains the most widely used graft source for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The drawback associated with BTB is increased donor-site morbidity, such as anterior knee pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare anterior knee pain after refilling the patella bony defect with bone substitute.
Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent BTB ACLR at a single institution between January 2015 and December 2020. The cohort was divided into two groups; one in which the patellar bony defect was refilled with bone substitute (Bone Graft group) and another in which this the bony defects were not treated (No Bone Graft group). Demographic variables, reported anterior knee pain, visual analog scale (VAS) score, complications, re-operation, and patient reported outcome measures, such as the IKDC, LYSHOLM and SF-12 scores, were compared between groups.
Results: A total of 286 patients who underwent BTB ACLR were included. The No Bone Graft group included 88 (30.7%) patients and the Bone Graft group included 198 (69.3%) patients. The Bone Graft group had less anterior knee pain at last clinic follow up (33.3% vs. 51.1% p = 0.004) as well as lower VAS anterior knee pain scores (2.18 vs. 3.13, p = 0.004). The Bone Graft group had lower complications rates (21.7% vs 34.1, p = 0.027). No differences were found in the LYSHOLM, IKDC, and SF-12 scores.
Conclusion: Bone refilling in BTB ACLR significantly reduces prevalence and severity of anterior knee pain. Larger randomized trials are needed to confirm the benefits of bone refilling in ACLR patients.
Level of evidence: Retrospective study-III.
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Anterior knee pain; Bone graft; Bone–patellar tendon–bone.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- van Dijck RAHE, Saris DB, Willems JW, Fievez AWFM (2008) Additional surgery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: can we improve technical aspects of the initial procedure? Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 24:88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2007.08.012 - DOI
-
- Baawa-Ameyaw J, Plastow R, Begum FA et al (2021) Current concepts in graft selection for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. EFORT Open Rev 6:808–815. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.6.210023 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Buerba R, Boden S, Lesniak B (2021) Graft selection in contemporary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. JAAOS Glob Res Rev 5:1–10. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00230 - DOI
-
- Okoroha KR, Keller RA, Jung EK et al (2016) Pain assessment after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop J Sport Med 4:232596711667492. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967116674924 - DOI
-
- Hardy A, Casabianca L, Andrieu K et al (2017) Complications following harvesting of patellar tendon or hamstring tendon grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: systematic review of literature. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103:S245–S248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2017.09.002 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
