Geographic access to eye health services in Aotearoa New Zealand: which communities are being left behind?
- PMID: 35917587
- DOI: 10.1080/08164622.2022.2102410
Geographic access to eye health services in Aotearoa New Zealand: which communities are being left behind?
Abstract
Clinical relevance: Efforts to provide accessible eye care must consider the extent to which travel-distance may be a barrier for some communities.
Background: This study aimed to determine the distribution of - and geographic access to - eye health services in Aotearoa New Zealand. We further sought to identify communities who might benefit from provision of eye health services that were more geographically accessible.
Methods: We obtained addresses of optometry and ophthalmology clinics from regulatory bodies and augmented this with online searches. Address locators were created using a Land Information dataset and geocoded using ArcGIS 10.6. A national population was derived using Statistics New Zealand's Integrated Data Infrastructure. We generated population-weighted centroids of each of New Zealand's 50,938 meshblocks and calculated the travel distance along the road network between each clinic and population (meshblock centroid). The proportion of the population living >50 km from each clinic type was calculated; as was the median, inter-quartile range and maximum distance across area-level deprivation quintiles in each district.
Results: A national population of 4.88 million was identified, as were addresses for 344 optometry, 46 public ophthalmology and 90 private ophthalmology clinics. Nationally and within each district, travel distance to optometry was shorter than to either type of ophthalmology clinic. The region of Northland - with a high proportion of the population Māori and in the highest quintile of area-level deprivation - had the furthest average distance to travel to optometry and public ophthalmology, while the West Coast region on the South Island had the farthest to travel to private ophthalmology. Several communities were identified where longer distances intersected with higher area-level deprivation.
Conclusion: Most New Zealanders live within 10 km of eye health services. However, to achieve equitable eye health, strategies are required that make affordable eye health services accessible to communities for whom large travel distances intersect with high deprivation.
Keywords: Aotearoa New Zealand; area-level deprivation; eye care access; health equity; travel distance.
Similar articles
-
A baseline audit of the population groups accessing optometry training clinics in Aotearoa New Zealand: looking towards equity in eye care.Clin Exp Optom. 2025 Mar 31:1-7. doi: 10.1080/08164622.2024.2433597. Online ahead of print. Clin Exp Optom. 2025. PMID: 40160089
-
Access to eye care among adults from an underserved community in Aotearoa New Zealand.Clin Exp Optom. 2024 Nov;107(8):826-834. doi: 10.1080/08164622.2023.2291527. Epub 2023 Dec 13. Clin Exp Optom. 2024. PMID: 38092018
-
Will access to COVID-19 vaccine in Aotearoa be equitable for priority populations?N Z Med J. 2021 May 21;134(1535):25-35. N Z Med J. 2021. PMID: 34012138
-
The Role of Optometry in the Delivery of Eye Care via Telehealth: A Systematic Literature Review.Telemed J E Health. 2022 Dec;28(12):1753-1763. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2021.0537. Epub 2022 May 24. Telemed J E Health. 2022. PMID: 35612473 Free PMC article.
-
What is the proper integration of optometry and ophthalmology?J Am Optom Assoc. 1992 Dec;63(12):830-2. J Am Optom Assoc. 1992. PMID: 1287057 Review.
Cited by
-
Using geographic information systems to map eye care service distribution in rural and remote Western Australia.BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 15;25(1):551. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12723-8. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025. PMID: 40234905 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources