Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 2;12(8):e049421.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049421.

Spin within systematic review abstracts on antiplatelet therapies after acute coronary syndrome: a cross-sectional study

Affiliations

Spin within systematic review abstracts on antiplatelet therapies after acute coronary syndrome: a cross-sectional study

Audrey Wise et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: Spin is a reporting practice in which study results are misrepresented by overestimating efficacy or underestimating harm. Prevalence of spin varies between clinical specialties, and estimates are based almost entirely on clinical trials. Little is known about spin in systematic reviews.

Design: We performed a cross-sectional analysis searching MEDLINE and Embase for systematic reviews and meta-analyses pertaining to antiplatelet therapies following acute coronary syndrome on 2 June 2020. Data were extracted evaluating the presence of spin and study characteristics, including methodological quality as rated by A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR-2). All data extraction was conducted in a masked, duplicate manner from 2 June 2020 to 26 June 2020.

Participants and setting: Not applicable.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: We assessed abstracts of systematic reviews on antiplatelet therapy following acute coronary syndrome and evaluated the prevalence of the nine most severe types of spin. We additionally explored associations between spin and certain study characteristics, including quality.

Results: Our searches returned 15 263 articles, and 185 systematic reviews met inclusion criteria. Of these 185 reviews, 31.9% (59/185) contained some form of spin in the abstract. Seven forms of spin (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 and 9) among the nine most severe were identified. No instances of types 6 or 8 were found. There were no statistically significant relationships between spin and the evaluated study characteristics or AMSTAR-2 appraisals.

Conclusions: Spin was present in abstracts for systematic reviews and meta-analyses; subsequent studies are needed to identify correlations between spin and specific study characteristics. There were no statistically significant associations between spin and study characteristics or AMSTAR-2 ratings; however, implementing changes will ensure that spin is reduced in the field of cardiology as well as other fields of medicine.

Keywords: Adult cardiology; Coronary heart disease; Ischaemic heart disease; Myocardial infarction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Search queries.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram of study selection. ACS, acute coronary syndrome.

Similar articles

References

    1. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al. . Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 2015;4:1. 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cook DJ, Greengold NL, Ellrodt AG, et al. . The relation between systematic reviews and practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med 1997;127:210. 10.7326/0003-4819-127-3-199708010-00006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Drucker AM, Fleming P, Chan A-W. Research techniques made simple: assessing risk of bias in systematic reviews. J Invest Dermatol 2016;136:e109–14. 10.1016/j.jid.2016.08.021 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marcelo A, Gavino A, Isip-Tan IT, et al. . A comparison of the accuracy of clinical decisions based on full-text articles and on Journal Abstracts alone: a study among residents in a tertiary care hospital. Evid Based Med 2013;18:48–53. 10.1136/eb-2012-100537 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Toma M, McAlister FA, Bialy L, et al. . Transition from meeting Abstract to full-length Journal article for randomized controlled trials. JAMA 2006;295:1281–7. 10.1001/jama.295.11.1281 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances