Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec;62(6):813-825.
doi: 10.1111/ajo.13599. Epub 2022 Aug 2.

Predicting postpartum haemorrhage: A systematic review of prognostic models

Bethany L Carr  1 , Maryam Jahangirifar  1 , Ann E Nicholson  2 , Wentao Li  3 , Ben W Mol  3 , Sharon Licqurish  1   4
Affiliations

Predicting postpartum haemorrhage: A systematic review of prognostic models

Bethany L Carr et al. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) remains a leading cause of maternal mortality and morbidity worldwide, and the rate is increasing. Using a reliable predictive model could identify those at risk, support management and treatment, and improve maternal outcomes.

Aims: To systematically identify and appraise existing prognostic models for PPH and ascertain suitability for clinical use.

Materials and methods: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched using combinations of terms and synonyms, including 'postpartum haemorrhage', 'prognostic model', and 'risk factors'. Observational or experimental studies describing a prognostic model for risk of PPH, published in English, were included. The Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies checklist informed data extraction and the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool guided analysis.

Results: Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria after screening 1612 records. All studies were hospital settings from eight different countries. Models were developed for women who experienced vaginal birth (n = 7), caesarean birth (n = 2), any type of birth (n = 2), hypertensive disorders (n = 1) and those with placental abnormalities (n = 4). All studies were at high risk of bias due to use of inappropriate analysis methods or omission of important statistical considerations or suboptimal validation.

Conclusions: No existing prognostic models for PPH are ready for clinical application. Future research is needed to externally validate existing models and potentially develop a new model that is reliable and applicable to clinical practice.

Keywords: maternal mortality; postpartum haemorrhage; pregnancy; prognosis; risk factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analysis (PRISMA) flowchart of included studies. PPH, postpartum haemorrhage.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Van Der Nelson H, O'Brien S, Lenguerrand E et al. Intramuscular oxytocin versus oxytocin/ergometrine versus carbetocin for prevention of primary postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal birth: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (the IMox study). Trials 2019; 20(1): 1–10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A et al. Global causes of maternal death: A WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2014; 2(6): 323–333. - PubMed
    1. Al‐Zirqi I, Vangen S, Forsen L, Stray‐Pedersen B. Prevalence and risk factors of severe obstetric haemorrhage. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2008; 115(10): 1265–1272. - PubMed
    1. Ford JB, Patterson JA, Seeho SKM, Roberts CL. Trends and outcomes of postpartum haemorrhage, 2003‐2011. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015; 15(1): 1–10. 10.1186/s12884-015-0788-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cameron C, Roberts CL, Olive EC et al. Trends in postpartum haemorrhage. Aust N Z J Public Health 2006; 30(2): 151–156. - PubMed

Publication types