Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 2;22(1):984.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08370-y.

Standardization of the assessment process within telerehabilitation in chronic diseases: a scoping meta-review

Blandine Chapel  1 , François Alexandre  2 , Nelly Heraud  2 , Roxana Ologeanu-Taddei  3 , Anne-Sophie Cases  4 , François Bughin  5 , Maurice Hayot  5
Affiliations

Standardization of the assessment process within telerehabilitation in chronic diseases: a scoping meta-review

Blandine Chapel et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Telerehabilitation (TR) interventions are receiving increasing attention. They have been evaluated in various scientific areas through systematic reviews. However, there is a lack of data on how to standardize assessment and report on their domains to guide researchers across studies and bring together the best evidence to assess TR for chronic diseases.

Aims and objectives: The aim of this study was to identify domains of assessment in TR and to qualitatively and quantitatively analyze how and when they are examined to gain an overview of assessment in chronic disease.

Methods: A scoping meta-review was carried out on 9 databases and gray literature from 2009 to 2019. The keyword search strategy was based on "telerehabilitation", "evaluation", "chronic disease" and their synonyms. All articles were subjected to qualitative analysis using the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Core Model prior to further analysis and narrative synthesis.

Results: Among the 7412 identified articles, 80 studies met the inclusion criteria and addressed at least one of the noncommunicable diseases (NCD) categories of cardiovascular disease (cardiovascular accidents), cancer, chronic respiratory disease, diabetes, and obesity. Regarding the domains of assessment, the most frequently occurring were "social aspect" (n = 63, 79%) (e.g., effects on behavioral changes) and "clinical efficacy" (n = 53, 66%), and the least frequently occurring was "safety aspects" (n = 2, 3%). We also identified the phases of TR in which the assessment was conducted and found that it most commonly occurred in the pilot study and randomized trial phases and least commonly occurred in the design, pretest, and post-implementation phases.

Conclusions: Through the HTA model, this scoping meta-review highlighted 10 assessment domains which have not been studied with the same degree of interest in the recent literature. We showed that each of these assessment domains could appear at different phases of TR development and proposed a new cross-disciplinary and comprehensive method for assessing TR interventions. Future studies will benefit from approaches that leverage the best evidence regarding the assessment of TR, and it will be interesting to extend this assessment framework to other chronic diseases.

Keywords: Chronic disease; Evaluation; Health technology assessment; Scoping meta-review; Telerehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow chart for the study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Telerehabilitation assessment process
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Evidence-based health policy-lessons from the Global Burden of Disease Study. Science. 1996;274(5288):740–743. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5288.740. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mazzucca S, Arredondo EM, Hoelscher DM, Haire-Joshu D, Tabak RG, Kumanyika SK, et al. Expanding implementation research to prevent chronic diseases in community settings. Annu Rev Public Health. 2021;42:135–158. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102547. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Celli BR, MacNee W, Agusti A, Anzueto A, Berg B, Buist AS, et al. Standards for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with COPD: a summary of the ATS/ERS position paper. Eur Respir J. 2004;23(6):932–946. doi: 10.1183/09031936.04.00014304. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Korpershoek YJ, Vervoort SC, Trappenburg JC, Schuurmans MJ. Perceptions of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and their health care providers towards using mHealth for self-management of exacerbations: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):757. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3545-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Latif S, Rana R, Qadir J, Ali A, Imran MA, Younis MS. Mobile health in the developing world: Review of literature and lessons from a case study. IEEE Access. 2017;5:11540–56.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources