Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 3;22(1):987.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08358-8.

Ambulance diversion and ED destination by race/ethnicity: evaluation of Massachusetts' ambulance diversion ban

Amresh D Hanchate  1   2 , William E Baker  3   4 , Michael K Paasche-Orlow  5   4 , James Feldman  3   4
Affiliations

Ambulance diversion and ED destination by race/ethnicity: evaluation of Massachusetts' ambulance diversion ban

Amresh D Hanchate et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: The impact of ambulance diversion on potentially diverted patients, particularly racial/ethnic minority patients, is largely unknown. Treating Massachusetts' 2009 ambulance diversion ban as a natural experiment, we examined if the ban was associated with increased concordance in Emergency Medical Services (EMS) patients of different race/ethnicity being transported to the same emergency department (ED).

Methods: We obtained Medicare Fee for Service claims records (2007-2012) for enrollees aged 66 and older. We stratified the country into patient zip codes and identified zip codes with sizable (non-Hispanic) White, (non-Hispanic) Black and Hispanic enrollees. For a stratified random sample of enrollees from all diverse zip codes in Massachusetts and 18 selected comparison states, we identified EMS transports to an ED. In each zip code, we identified the most frequent ED destination of White EMS-transported patients ("reference ED"). Our main outcome was a dichotomous indicator of patient EMS transport to the reference ED, and secondary outcome was transport to an ED serving lower-income patients ("safety-net ED"). Using a difference-in-differences regression specification, we contrasted the pre- to post-ban changes in each outcome in Massachusetts with the corresponding change in the comparison states.

Results: Our study cohort of 744,791 enrollees from 3331 zip codes experienced 361,006 EMS transports. At baseline, the proportion transported to the reference ED was higher among White patients in Massachusetts and comparison states (67.2 and 60.9%) than among Black (43.6 and 46.2%) and Hispanic (62.5 and 52.7%) patients. Massachusetts ambulance diversion ban was associated with a decreased proportion transported to the reference ED among White (- 2.7 percentage point; 95% CI, - 4.5 to - 1.0) and Black (- 4.1 percentage point; 95% CI, - 6.2 to - 1.9) patients and no change among Hispanic patients. The ban was associated with an increase in likelihood of transport to a safety-net ED among Hispanic patients (3.0 percentage points, 95% CI, 0.3 to 5.7) and a decreased likelihood among White patients (1.2 percentage points, 95% CI, - 2.3 to - 0.2).

Conclusion: Massachusetts ambulance diversion ban was associated with a reduction in the proportion of White and Black EMS patients being transported to the most frequent ED destination for White patients, highlighting the role of non-proximity factors in EMS transport destination.

Keywords: Disparity; Emergency department; Emergency medical services; Ethnicity; Race; Safety-net hospital; ambulance diversion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Proportion (%) of EMS Transports to Reference ED: All and Racial/ethnic Minorities
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Burt CW, McCaig LF, Valverde RH. Analysis of ambulance transports and diversions among US emergency departments. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;47(4):317–326. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.12.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Castillo EM, Vilke GM, Williams M, Turner P, Boyle J, Chan TC. Collaborative to decrease ambulance diversion: the California emergency department diversion project. J Emerg Med. 2011;40(3):300–307. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2010.02.023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Handel DA, Pines J, Aronsky D, et al. Variations in crowding and ambulance diversion in nine emergency departments. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18(9):941–946. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01149.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hsia RY-J, Asch SM, Weiss RE, et al. California hospitals serving large minority populations were more likely than others to employ ambulance diversion. Health Aff. 2012;31(8):1767–1776. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1020. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kahn CA, Stratton SJ, Anderson CL. Characteristics of hospitals diverting ambulances in a California EMS system. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(1):27–31. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X13009242. - DOI - PubMed