Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;70(8):2950-2955.
doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_12_22.

An experimental study to evaluate the effect of polymixin E (Colistin) alone or in combination with gentamicin in McCarey-Kaufman corneal preservation medium on various drug resistant bacterial and fungal isolates

Affiliations

An experimental study to evaluate the effect of polymixin E (Colistin) alone or in combination with gentamicin in McCarey-Kaufman corneal preservation medium on various drug resistant bacterial and fungal isolates

K Sushmasri et al. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the efficacy of the addition of polymyxin E (colistin) in the McCarey-Kaufman (MK) corneal storage solution against multi-drug resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida spp.

Methods: A standard micro broth dilution test and a checkerboard assay were performed for five multi-drug resistant (MDR) clinical strains of P. aeruginosa and five clinical strains of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and C. albicans against colistin and gentamicin alone and in combination. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) were calculated to assess the efficacy of each combination.

Results: The MIC of colistin was in the range of 1-2 μg/mL for P. aeruginosa, whereas it was 256-1024 μg/mL against S. aureus. In comparison, the MIC of gentamicin was found to be 0.5-512 μg/mL and 0.5-8 μg/mL against P. aeruginosa and S. aureus, respectively. All five isolates of C. albicans did not exhibit any susceptibility to either colistin or gentamicin even at a concentration of ≥ 512 μg/mL each. The checkerboard assay was performed to evaluate the nature of the interaction of the combination of colistin and gentamicin. Based on the FICI, it was observed that the colistin and gentamicin combination has a maximum synergistic effect (FIC <0.5) in 80% (4/5) for S. aureus isolates, whereas the maximum additive effect (FIC >0.5-4) was 100% (5/5) for P. aeruginosa and the minimum additive effect was 20% (1/5) for S. aureus isolates. Antagonism (FIC ≥ 4) was not observed in any combination between the strains used in the study. Both colistin and gentamicin alone or in combination were, however, ineffective against Candida spp.

Conclusion: The addition of colistin has an inhibitory effect on bacterial contamination that could be possibly caused by MDR strains and could potentially be considered as an additional additive in corneal storage media.

Keywords: Colistin; MK medium; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; endophthalmitis; post keratoplasty infections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Depicts the way gentamicin and colistin were added to the 96-well plates for the checkerboard assay
Figure 2
Figure 2
A representative image of 96-well plates containing varying concentrations of colistin ranging from 16 µg/mL to 0.25 µg/mL against five isolates of MDR P. aeruginosa. The MIC is indicated by the lowest concentration of colistin required to completely inhibit the growth of MDR P. aeruginosa
Figure 3
Figure 3
Graph depicting the percentage of synergism and additive effects of a combination of colistin and gentamicin on P. aeruginosa and S. aureus isolates
Figure 4
Figure 4
Graph depicting the percentage of viable corneal endothelial cells in Opti-MEM (control 1), MK media (control 2), and MK media with different concentrations of colistin

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kloess PM, Stulting RD, Waring GO, 3rd, Wilson LA. Bacterial and fungal endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115:309–16. Erratum in:Am J Ophthalmol 1993;115:548. - PubMed
    1. Chen JY, Jones MN, Srinivasan S, Neal TJ, Armitage WJ, Kaye SB NHSBT Ocular Tissue Advisory Group and Contributing Ophthalmologists (OTAG Audit Study 18) Endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:25–30. - PubMed
    1. Das S, Ramappa M, Mohamed A, Chaurasia S, Sharma S, Das T. Acute endophthalmitis after penetrating and endothelial keratoplasty at a tertiary eye care center over a 13-year period. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68:2445–50. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Edelstein SL, DeMatteo J, Stoeger CG, Macsai MS, Wang CH. Report of the Eye Bank Association of America medical review subcommittee on adverse reactions reported from 2007 to 2014. Cornea. 2016;35:917–26. - PubMed
    1. Yousfi H, Ranque S, Rolain JM, Bittar F. In vitro polymyxin activity against clinical multidrug-resistant fungi. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019;8:66. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms