Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 26:16:1399.
doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2022.1399. eCollection 2022.

Information-sharing experiences of professionals looking after children with cancer: a qualitative exploration from a specialist paediatric oncology unit in India

Affiliations

Information-sharing experiences of professionals looking after children with cancer: a qualitative exploration from a specialist paediatric oncology unit in India

Trishna Chaudhuri et al. Ecancermedicalscience. .

Abstract

Background: Childhood cancer often involves a long-term engagement of children and their parents with health services. During this journey, communications between professionals, parents and young people can be stressful for all the stakeholders. This study explores the communication preferences in paediatric oncology.

Objectives: The objective of the present exploratory qualitative study was to understand the views of professionals regarding information exchange during cancer treatment of children and complement these findings with clinic-based ethnographic observation of real-life consultations.

Methods: Using qualitative methods, in-depth interviews were conducted with paediatric oncology professionals. The interviews had been audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Alongside in-depth interviews, real-life interactions between parents, professionals and children were observed. Data were analysed using a thematic analysis framework as suggested by Braun and Clark.

Results: Paediatric oncology professionals (n = 14) were interviewed from diverse professional backgrounds that included consultant paediatric oncologists, junior specialist trainees in paediatric oncology, paediatric oncology nurses, social workers, survivor counsellor and psychologists looking after children with cancer. Additionally, clinic-based ethnographic observations (n = 10) of interactions between professionals, parents and young people were also conducted. The following themes emerged from the interviews: a) Information needs of children were very different from adolescents. Children were more worried about 'here and now'; b) adolescents were, on the other hand, mostly worried about the 'impact of cancer on their broader life, friendships and academics'; c) parents were curious about the outcome, costs and effectiveness of treatment, and different patterns emerged for mothers and fathers; d) information needs were dynamic and different at the start of the treatment, during treatment, at remission or end of life; e) the journey of the clinicians themselves impacted information-sharing practices; and f) direct observation of consultations highlighted the importance of priming parents before delivery of information, having multiple family members during the conversation and managing intense emotions expressed during the session.

Conclusion: Paediatric oncology professionals need to be sensitive about the dynamic nature of information needs while interacting with children and parents of children with cancer. The above findings may help tailor the discussions that professionals ought to have with families with a child with cancer. The results may contribute to the understanding as well as to developing training courses on communications in paediatric oncology for low- and middle-income countries.

Keywords: cancer; children; communication; health professionals; oncology; paediatric.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they do not have any conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Coding tree: Information sharing in paediatric oncology.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Children listening to adult conversations in paediatric wards.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Creating an environment for effective and empathic communication in paediatric oncology.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization: International Agency for Research on Cancer. Data visualization tools for exploring the global cancer burden in 2020. 2020. [10/01/21]. [Internet] http://gco.iarc.fr/today/home.
    1. Gupta S, Howard SC, Hunger SP, et al. Disease Control Priorities. 3rd. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2015. Treating childhood cancer in low- and middle-income countries; pp. 121–146. [Internet] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK343626/ - PubMed
    1. Friedrich P, Lam CG, Itriago E, et al. Magnitude of treatment abandonment in childhood cancer. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0135230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135230. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hazarika M, Mishra R, Saikia BJ, et al. Causes of treatment abandonment of pediatric cancer patients – experience in a Regional Cancer Centre in North East India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev APJCP. 2019;20(4):1133–1137. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.4.1133. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Renner LA, McGill D. Exploring factors influencing health-seeking decisions and retention in childhood cancer treatment programmes: perspectives of parents in Ghana. Ghana Med J. 2016;50(3):149–156. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v50i3.6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources