Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jul 11:2022:1541980.
doi: 10.1155/2022/1541980. eCollection 2022.

Review on Hybrid Segmentation Methods for Identification of Brain Tumor in MRI

Affiliations
Review

Review on Hybrid Segmentation Methods for Identification of Brain Tumor in MRI

Khurram Ejaz et al. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. .

Abstract

Modalities like MRI give information about organs and highlight diseases. Organ information is visualized in intensities. The segmentation method plays an important role in the identification of the region of interest (ROI). The ROI can be segmented from the image using clustering, features, and region extraction. Segmentation can be performed in steps; firstly, the region is extracted from the image. Secondly, feature extraction performed, and better features are selected. They can be shape, texture, or intensity. Thirdly, clustering segments the shape of tumor, tumor has specified shape, and shape is detected by feature. Clustering consists of FCM, K-means, FKM, and their hybrid. To support the segmentation, we conducted three studies (region extraction, feature, and clustering) which are discussed in the first line of this review paper. All these studies are targeting MRI as a modality. MRI visualization proved to be more accurate for the identification of diseases compared with other modalities. Information of the modality is compromised due to low pass image. In MRI Images, the tumor intensities are variable in tumor areas as well as in tumor boundaries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Process of medical image segmentation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Architecture of MRI machine (source: [93]).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Image of T1 (BraTS17_13_2_1).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Image of FLAIR (BraTS17_13_2_1).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Image of T2 (BraTS17_13_2_1).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Image of T1CE (BraTS17_13_2_1).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Soft computing and image segmentation approaches.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Input T1 sequence image.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Image enhancement of Figure 8.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chouhan S. S., Kaul A., Singh U. P. Soft computing approaches for image segmentation: a survey. Multimedia Tools and Applications . 2018;77(21) doi: 10.1007/s11042-018-6005-6.28483 - DOI
    1. Kumar E. P., Kumar V. M., Sumithra M. Tumour detection in brain MRI using improved segmentation algorithm. Proceedings of the 2013 Fourth International Conference on Computing, Communications and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT); July, 2013; Tiruchengode, India. IEEE; - DOI
    1. Aslam A., Khan E., Beg M. S. Improved edge detection algorithm for brain tumor segmentation. Procedia Computer Science . 2015;58:430–437. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.057. - DOI
    1. Vishnuvarthanan G., Rajasekaran M. P., Subbaraj P., Vishnuvarthanan A. An unsupervised learning method with a clustering approach for tumor identification and tissue segmentation in magnetic resonance brain images. Applied Soft Computing . 2016;38:190–212. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.09.016. - DOI
    1. Swamy S., Kulkarni P. Image processing for identifying brain tumor using intelligent system. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol . 2015;4(11)