Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep;42(9):1210-1215.
doi: 10.1038/s41372-022-01472-9. Epub 2022 Aug 3.

Does videolaryngoscopy improve tracheal intubation first attempt success in the NICUs? A report from the NEAR4NEOS

Affiliations

Does videolaryngoscopy improve tracheal intubation first attempt success in the NICUs? A report from the NEAR4NEOS

Ahmed Moussa et al. J Perinatol. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: We hypothesized that videolaryngoscope use for tracheal intubations would differ across NICUs, be associated with higher first attempt success and lower adverse events.

Study design: Data from the National Emergency Airway Registry for Neonates (01/2015 to 12/2017) included intubation with direct laryngoscope or videolaryngoscope. Primary outcome was first attempt success. Secondary outcomes were adverse tracheal intubation associated events and severe desaturation.

Results: Of 2730 encounters (13 NICUs), 626 (23%) utilized a videolaryngoscope (3% to 64% per site). Videolaryngoscope use was associated with higher first attempt success (p < 0.001), lower adverse tracheal intubation associated events (p < 0.001), but no difference in severe desaturation. After adjustment, videolaryngoscope use was not associated with higher first attempt success (OR:1.18, p = 0.136), but was associated with lower tracheal intubation associated events (OR:0.45, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Videolaryngoscope use is variable, not independently associated with higher first attempt success but associated with fewer tracheal intubation associated events.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Videolaryngoscope use in the Neonatal Intensive Care Units.
This figure presents the proportion of intubations using the videolaryngoscope (VL) per participating site.

References

    1. Hatch LD, Grubb PH, Lea AS, Walsh WF, Markham MH, Whitney GM, et al. Endotracheal Intubation in Neonates: A Prospective Study of Adverse Safety Events in 162 Infants. J Pediatr. 2016;168:62–6.e66. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.09.077. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Foglia EE, Ades A, Sawyer T, Glass KM, Singh N, Kessler P, et al. Neonatal Intubation Practice and Outcomes: An International Registry Study. Pediatrics. 2019;143:e20180902. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-0902. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Haubner LY, Barry JS, Johnston LC, Soghier L, Tatum PM, Kessler D, et al. Neonatal intubation performance: room for improvement in tertiary neonatal intensive care units. Resuscitation. 2013;84:1359–64. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.03.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Page NE, Giehl M, Luke S. Intubation complications in the critically ill child. AACN Clin Issues. 1998;9:25–35. doi: 10.1097/00044067-199802000-00003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kaplan MB, Ward DS, Berci G. A new video laryngoscope-an aid to intubation and teaching. J Clin Anesth. 2002;14:620–6. doi: 10.1016/S0952-8180(02)00457-9. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types