Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 28:16:11782218221103581.
doi: 10.1177/11782218221103581. eCollection 2022.

Problematic Opioid Use: A Scoping Literature Review of Profiles

Affiliations

Problematic Opioid Use: A Scoping Literature Review of Profiles

Léonie Archambault et al. Subst Abuse. .

Abstract

Background and objectives: Problematic opioid use can be defined as opioid use behaviors leading to social, medical, or psychological consequences. In some instances, people presenting problematic opioid use can also meet criteria for an opioid use disorder. A growing body of literature highlights different types of people who use opioids, with contrasting characteristics and initiation patterns. In recent years, dynamic trends in opioid use have been documented and studies have demonstrated a shift in profiles.

Methods: A scoping literature review was conducted to identify profiles of people presenting problematic opioid use, in order to support the development of tailored interventions and services.

Results: Nine articles met the inclusion criteria. Five classifications emerge from the literature reviewed to distinguish types of people presenting problematic opioid use, according to: (1) the type of opioids used, (2) the route of opioid administration, (3) the level of quality of life, (4) patterns of other drugs used, and (5) dependence severity. While samples, concepts, and measurement tools vary between studies, the most salient finding might be the distinct profile of people presenting problematic use of pharmaceutical-type opioids.

Discussion and conclusions: This scoping review highlights that few studies address distinctive profiles of people presenting problematic opioid use. Geographical and chronological differences suggest that local timely assessments may be needed to tailor the service offer to specific needs.

Scientific significance: Future studies should focus on providing a deep understanding of distinct experiential perspectives and service needs, through exploratory quantitative and qualitative designs.

Keywords: Opioid; characteristics; comorbidities; problematic use; profiles.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this paper.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow chart.

References

    1. Dufort A, Samaan Z. Problematic opioid use among older adults: epidemiology, adverse outcomes and treatment considerations. Drugs Aging. 2021;38:1043-1053. - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5. 5th ed. American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
    1. Lindley B, Cox N, Cochran G. Screening tools for detecting problematic opioid use and potential application to community pharmacy practice: a review. Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2019;8:85-96. - PMC - PubMed
    1. OECD. Addressing Problematic Opioid Use in OECD Countries, OECD Health Policy Studies. OECD Publishing; 2019.
    1. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). World drug report: executive summary policy implications. Published June 2021. Accessed April 1, 2022. https://www.unodc.org/res/wdr2021/field/WDR21_Booklet_1.pdf

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources