Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 18:9:874047.
doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.874047. eCollection 2022.

Proposition of Cutoff Points for Anthropometric Indicators to Identify High Blood Pressure in Adolescents

Affiliations

Proposition of Cutoff Points for Anthropometric Indicators to Identify High Blood Pressure in Adolescents

Leandro Lima Borges et al. Front Nutr. .

Abstract

Aim: To propose cutoff points for anthropometric indicators for high blood pressure (HBP) screening in adolescents and to identify, among these indicators, those more accurately for boys and girls.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out in the city of São José, SC, Brazil with 634 adolescents aged 14 to 19 years. Blood pressure levels were measured using a digital oscillometric sphygmomanometer and adolescents were classified as having HBP or not. Anthropometric indicators were calculated based on anthropometric measurements such as body mass (BM), height, waist circumference (WC), hip circumference (HC) and triceps, subscapularis, suprailiac, and midcalf skinfold thickness (SF). The Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC) was used to analyze the predictive capacity of anthropometric indicators in the identification of HBP.

Results: Higher values of Area Under the Curve (AUC) were for the anthropometric indicators BM (0.67; 95%CI: 0.62-0.72), body mass index (BMI) (0.67; 95%CI: 0.62-0.72), and WC (0.67; 95%CI: 0.62-0.71) for males. For females, no anthropometric indicator had discriminatory power for HBP screening. The cutoff points for the anthropometric indicators with discriminatory power for HBP screening in males were BM > 64.80 Kg, BMI > 21.76 Kg/m2, fat percentage (FP) > 15.75, waist height to ratio (WHtR) > 0.41, WC > 73.00 cm, and HC > 92.25 cm.

Conclusion: Anthropometric indicators of body adiposity had greater discriminatory power of HBP screening in males. For females, caution is suggested because the anthropometric indicators showed AUC values (95%CI) below 0.60.

Keywords: accuracy; anthropometry; blood pressure; cutoff points; youth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pinheiro G, Mello J, Gaya A, Gaya AR. Pressão Arterial de Crianças: Associação a Indicadores Antropométricos, Composição Corporal, Aptidão Cardiorrespiratória e Atividade Física. Arq Bras Cardiol. (2021) 116:950–6. 10.36660/abc.20190520 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goelzer MNAP, Scala LCN. Prevalência de hipertensão arterial, pré-hipertensão e fatores associados em crianças e adolescentes de escolas municipais de Cuiabá, Mato Grosso. Connection Line-Revista Eletrônica do Univag. (2020) 23:4–23. 10.18312/connectionline.v0i23.1586 - DOI
    1. Noubiap JJ, Essouma M, Bigna JJ, Jingi AM, Aminde LN, Nansseu JR. Prevalence of elevated blood pressure in children and adolescents in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health. (2017) 2:e375–86. 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30123-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang L, Song L, Liu B, Zhang L, Wu M, Cao Z, et al. . Trends and status of the prevalence of elevated blood pressure in children and adolescents in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Hypertens Rep. (2019) 21:1–12. 10.1007/s11906-019-0992-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Daniel RA, Haldar P, Prasad M, Kant S, Krishnan A, Gupta SK, et al. . Prevalence of hypertension among adolescents (10-19 years) in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies. PLoS ONE. (2020) 15:e0239929. 10.1371/journal.pone.0239929 - DOI - PMC - PubMed