Editorial: Controlling psychometric measures for method effects by means of factor analysis

Affiliations

¹ Department of Educational Studies, University of South Carolina, Columbia, MO, United States.
² Institute of Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
³ Department of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Editorial

Christine DiStefano et al. Front Psychol. 2022.

. 2022 Jul 18:13:984050.

doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.984050. eCollection 2022.

¹ Department of Educational Studies, University of South Carolina, Columbia, MO, United States.
² Institute of Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
³ Department of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

No abstract available

Keywords: contextual effect; factor analysis; measurement; method effect; validity.

Comment on

Editorial on the Research Topic Controlling Psychometric Measures for Method Effects by Means of Factor Analysis

1. American Educational Research Association the American Psychological Association, and the National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Testing Standards for Psychological and Educational Testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association Publishers.
1. Bandalos D. L.. (2018). Measurement Theory and Applications for the Social Sciences. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
1. Marsh H.W., Grayson D. (1995). “Latent variable models of multitrait-multimethod data,” in Structural Equation Modeling: Concept, Issues, and Applications, ed R. H. Hoyle (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; ), 177–198.
1. Marsh H. W.. (1989). Confirmatory factor analyses of multitrait-multimethod data: many problems and a few solutions. Appl. Psychol. Measur. 13, 335–361.