Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 18:9:785734.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.785734. eCollection 2022.

Mitochondrial Oxygenation During Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Pilot Study

Affiliations

Mitochondrial Oxygenation During Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Pilot Study

Floor A Harms et al. Front Med (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Objective: Adequate oxygenation is essential for the preservation of organ function during cardiac surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Both hypoxia and hyperoxia result in undesired outcomes, and a narrow window for optimal oxygenation exists. Current perioperative monitoring techniques are not always sufficient to monitor adequate oxygenation. The non-invasive COMET® monitor could be a tool to monitor oxygenation by measuring the cutaneous mitochondrial oxygen tension (mitoPO2). This pilot study examines the feasibility of cutaneous mitoPO2 measurements during cardiothoracic procedures. Cutaneous mitoPO2 will be compared to tissue oxygenation (StO2) as measured by near-infrared spectroscopy.

Design and method: This single-center observational study examined 41 cardiac surgery patients requiring CPB. Preoperatively, patients received a 5-aminolevulinic acid plaster on the upper arm to enable mitoPO2 measurements. After induction of anesthesia, both cutaneous mitoPO2 and StO2 were measured throughout the procedure. The patients were observed until discharge for the development of acute kidney insufficiency (AKI).

Results: Cutaneous mitoPO2 was successfully measured in all patients and was 63.5 [40.0-74.8] mmHg at the surgery start and decreased significantly (p < 0.01) to 36.4 [18.4-56.0] mmHg by the end of the CPB run. StO2 at the surgery start was 80.5 [76.8-84.3]% and did not change significantly. Cross-clamping of the aorta and the switch to non-pulsatile flow resulted in a median cutaneous mitoPO2 decrease of 7 mmHg (p < 0.01). The cessation of the aortic cross-clamping period resulted in an increase of 4 mmHg (p < 0.01). Totally, four patients developed AKI and had a lower preoperative eGFR of 52 vs. 81 ml/min in the non-AKI group. The AKI group spent 32% of the operation time with a cutaneous mitoPO2 value under 20 mmHg as compared to 8% in the non-AKI group.

Conclusion: This pilot study illustrated the feasibility of measuring cutaneous mitoPO2 using the COMET® monitor during cardiothoracic procedures. Moreover, in contrast to StO2, mitoPO2 decreased significantly with the increasing CPB run time. Cutaneous mitoPO2 also significantly decreased during the aortic cross-clamping period and increased upon the release of the clamp, but StO2 did not. This emphasized the sensitivity of cutaneous mitoPO2 to detect circulatory and microvascular changes.

Keywords: acute kidney injury; cardiopulmonary bypass and maze procedure; ischemia; microcirculation; mitochondria; mitochondrial oxygenation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

EM is listed as an inventor on patents related to mitochondrial oxygen measurements held by the Academic Medical Center Amsterdam and the Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands. He is the founder and shareholder of Photonics Healthcare, a company that holds exclusive licenses to these patents and that markets the COMET® system. RU is a minority shareholder of Photonics Healthcare. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Aortic cross-clamp data window preparation. The window time period is the same for the CABG cohort and the valve surgery cohort, such as 15 min after the start of extracorporeal circulation. In the CABG group, the flow is pulsatile in the data window, and in the valve surgery group, it is non-pulsatile, since the aortic cross-clamp has been set.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patient study flowchart.
Figure 3
Figure 3
First and last four values during CPB, COMET® cutaneous mitoPO2 n = 41, ***p < 0.01, INVOS® StO2, n = 31, p = not significant (NS). Boxplot with median, IQR box, and whisker 1.5 times IQR.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) Distribution of cutaneous mitoPO2 during CPB and (B) distribution of StO2 during CPB, with the start of CPB at t = 0. Dots represent the mean value of patient-averaged cutaneous mitoPO2 per 10-min window. Whiskers demonstrate the standard deviation. Bars represent the number of patients.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Cutaneous mitoPO2 values before and after aortic clamping and cutaneous mitoPO2 values before and after the release of aortic clamping. WU test paired p < 0.01***.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Comparison between valve surgery aortic cross-clamp period and CABG non-aortic cross-clamp period. An average of the 20-min data window after the extracorporeal circulation has been running for 15 min per patient. Mean SD plot of cutaneous mitoPO2. *indicates a statistically significant difference p < 0.05.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Example of minutes below threshold calculation. The dots are cutaneous mitoPO2 values, and the dashed line is the threshold set at 20 mmHg. In this case, the cutaneous mitoPO2 was below the threshold for 13 min.
Figure 8
Figure 8
(A) Absolute time within cutaneous mitoPO2 ranges for AKI (n = 4) patients and non-AKI (n = 37) patients. The cutaneous mitoPO2 ranges were below 20 mmHg, between 20 and 40 mmHg, and above 40 mmHg. Boxplot with median, IQR box, and whisker 1.5 times IQR, and outliers are not shown. (B) Time spent within a range as a proportion of CPB/extracorporeal circulation duration. Proportion is achieved by dividing the number of minutes below the threshold by CPB duration.

References

    1. Thiele RH, Isbell JM, Rosner MH. AKI associated with cardiac surgery. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. (2015) 10:500–14. 10.2215/CJN.07830814 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holmgaard F, Vedel AG, Rasmussen LS, Paulson OB, Nilsson JC, Ravn HB. The association between postoperative cognitive dysfunction and cerebral oximetry during cardiac surgery: a secondary analysis of a randomised trial. Br J Anaesth. (2019) 123:196–205. 10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.045 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cartin-Ceba R, Kashiouris M, Plataki M, Kor DJ, Gajic O, Casey ET. Risk factors for development of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Crit Care Res Pract. (2012) 2012:691013. 10.1155/2012/691013 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Young RW. Hyperoxia: a review of the risks and benefits in adult cardiac surgery. J Extra Corpor Technol. (2012) 44:241–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spoelstra-de Man AM, Smit B, Oudemans-van Straaten HM, Smulders YM. Cardiovascular effects of hyperoxia during and after cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia. (2015) 70:130719. 10.1111/anae.13218 - DOI - PubMed