Measuring Work-related Risk of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Comparison of COVID-19 Incidence by Occupation and Industry-Wisconsin, September 2020 to May 2021
- PMID: 35924351
- PMCID: PMC9384654
- DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciac586
Measuring Work-related Risk of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Comparison of COVID-19 Incidence by Occupation and Industry-Wisconsin, September 2020 to May 2021
Abstract
Background: Work-related exposures play an important role in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission, yet few studies have compared SARS-CoV-2 expsoure risk across occupations and industries.
Methods: During September 2020 to May 2021, the Wisconsin Department of Health Services collected occupation and industry data as part of routine coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) case investigations. Adults aged 18-64 years with confirmed or probable COVID-19 in Wisconsin were assigned standardized occupation and industry codes. Cumulative incidence rates were weighted for non-response and calculated using full-time equivalent (FTE) workforce denominators from the 2020 American Community Survey.
Results: An estimated 11.6% of workers (347 013 of 2.98 million) in Wisconsin, ages 18-64 years, had COVID-19 from September 2020 to May 2021. The highest incidence by occupation (per 100 FTE) occurred among personal care and services workers (22.1), healthcare practitioners and support staff (20.7), and protective services workers (20.7). High-risk sub-groups included nursing assistants and personal care aides (28.8), childcare workers (25.8), food and beverage service workers (25.3), personal appearance workers (24.4), and law enforcement workers (24.1). By industry, incidence was highest in healthcare (18.6); the highest risk sub-sectors were nursing care facilities (30.5) and warehousing (28.5).
Conclusions: This analysis represents one of the most complete examinations to date of COVID-19 incidence by occupation and industry. Our approach demonstrates the value of standardized occupational data collection by public health and may be a model for improved occupational surveillance elsewhere. Workers at higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 exposure may benefit from targeted workplace COVID-19 vaccination and mitigation efforts.
Keywords: COVID-19; Wisconsin; epidemiology; industry; occupation.
Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America 2022. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.
Conflict of interest statement
Potential conflicts of interest . The authors: No reported conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.
Similar articles
-
COVID-19 in the workplace: Self-reported source of exposure and availability of personal protective equipment by industry and occupation in Michigan.Am J Ind Med. 2022 Dec;65(12):994-1005. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23430. Epub 2022 Sep 24. Am J Ind Med. 2022. PMID: 36151779 Free PMC article.
-
Excess risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among in-person nonhealthcare workers in six states, September 2020-June 2021.Am J Ind Med. 2023 Jul;66(7):587-600. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23487. Epub 2023 May 8. Am J Ind Med. 2023. PMID: 37153939
-
Risk factors for COVID-19 among Californians working outside the home, November 2020 - May 2021.Am J Ind Med. 2023 Mar;66(3):233-242. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23459. Epub 2023 Jan 24. Am J Ind Med. 2023. PMID: 36694299
-
SARS-CoV-2 infection among Colorado adults working outside the home: Occupation, race and ethnicity and mask use.Am J Ind Med. 2024 Nov;67(11):961-970. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23639. Epub 2024 Sep 2. Am J Ind Med. 2024. PMID: 39223073 Review.
-
Industry Sectors Highly Affected by Worksite Outbreaks of Coronavirus Disease, Los Angeles County, California, USA, March 19-September 30, 2020.Emerg Infect Dis. 2021;27(7):1769-1775. doi: 10.3201/eid2707.210425. Epub 2021 May 12. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021. PMID: 33979564 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Lost time: COVID-19 indemnity claim reporting and results in the Wisconsin workers' compensation system from March 12 to December 31, 2020.Am J Ind Med. 2022 Dec;65(12):1006-1021. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23428. Epub 2022 Oct 25. Am J Ind Med. 2022. PMID: 36282631 Free PMC article.
-
Work: A Social Determinant of Health Worth Capturing.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 10;20(2):1199. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021199. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36673956 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of COVID-19 and Long COVID by Industry and Occupation: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2022.Am J Ind Med. 2025 Jan;68(1):26-52. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23665. Epub 2024 Oct 11. Am J Ind Med. 2025. PMID: 39392098 Free PMC article.
-
Occupational COVID-19 Exposures and Illnesses among Workers in California-Analysis of a New Occupational COVID-19 Surveillance System.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 6;20(13):6307. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20136307. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37444154 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among US blood donors by industry, May-December 2021.Am J Ind Med. 2024 Feb;67(2):169-173. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23552. Epub 2023 Dec 4. Am J Ind Med. 2024. PMID: 38047323 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous