Clinical implementation of kVCT-guided tomotherapy with ClearRT
- PMID: 35925545
- DOI: 10.1007/s13246-022-01162-y
Clinical implementation of kVCT-guided tomotherapy with ClearRT
Abstract
A helical fan-beam kilovoltage computed tomography (kVCT) was recently introduced into Tomotherapy units. This study aims to share the initial experience of kVCT in clinical workflow, compare its performance with that of the existing megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT), and explore its potential in adaptive planning. We retrospectively enrolled 23 patients who underwent both MVCT and kVCT scans. The clinical performance data regarding image acquisition time, nominal dose length product (DLP), registration time and registration corrections were extracted and compared. Image quality was scored by six experienced radiation therapists and quantified based on phantom measurements. CT number stability and the implementation of adaptive radiotherapy were dosimetrically evaluated by performing the dose recalculation on kVCT. Compared to MVCT, kVCT significantly reduced DLP (except the highest kVp protocol), image acquisition and registration time. KVCT obtained higher scores than MVCT on all criteria except artifacts. Phantom measurements also revealed a better image performance characterization of kVCT except for image uniformity. The CT number variation could lead to a dose difference of 0.5% for D95% of target and Dmean of organ-at-risk. For the treatment planning with kVCT, a systematic dose difference (> 1%) in PTV dose metrics was observed at regions with large longitudinal density discontinuities compared to the reference plans. The new kVCT imaging provides enhanced soft-tissue visualization. The improved efficiency with kVCT-guided treatment will allow more patients to be treated each day. In most cases, the dose calculation accuracy of kVCT images is acceptable except for regions with severe artifacts.
Keywords: ClearRT; Dosimetric evaluation; Image quality; Radixact; Tomotherapy; kVCT.
© 2022. Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine.
References
-
- Alongi F, Fodor A, Maggio A, Cozzarini C, Fiorino C, Broggi S, Alongi P, Calandrino R, Muzio ND (2011) Megavoltage CT images of helical tomotherapy unit for radiation treatment simulation: impact on feasibility of treatment planning in a prostate cancer patient with bilateral femoral prostheses. Tumori 97(2):221–224. https://doi.org/10.1700/667.7787 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Aubin M, Morin O, Chen J, Gillis A, Pickett B, Aubry JF, Akazawa C, Speight J, Roach 3 M, Pouliot J (2006) The use of megavoltage cone-beam CT to complement CT for target definition in pelvic radiotherapy in the presence of hip replacement. Br J Radiol 79(947):918–921. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/19559792
-
- De Marco P, Abdi Osman I, Castellini F, Ricotti R, Leonardi MC, Miglietta E, Cambria R, Origgi D, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Garibaldi C, Cattani F (2019) Image quality and dose evaluation of MVCT TomoTherapy acquisitions: a phantom study. Phys Med 57:200–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.01.009 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kilby W, Sage J, Rabett V (2002) Tolerance levels for quality assurance of electron density values generated from CT in radiotherapy treatment planning. Phys Med Biol 47(9):1485–1492. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/47/9/304 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Langen KM, Papanikolaou N, Balog J, Crilly R, Followill D, Goddu SM, Grant 3 W, Olivera G, Ramsey CR, Shi C, Group AT (2010) QA for helical tomotherapy: report of the AAPM Task Group 148. Med Phys 37(9):4817–4853. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3462971