Long-term joint outcomes in adolescents with moderate or severe haemophilia A
- PMID: 35925557
- PMCID: PMC9804743
- DOI: 10.1111/hae.14636
Long-term joint outcomes in adolescents with moderate or severe haemophilia A
Abstract
Introduction: Favourable joint outcomes are expected with modern haemophilia A (HA) management. Evaluation of long-term treatment outcomes is hampered by the delay between bleeding episodes during childhood and resulting joint outcomes in adulthood.
Aim: To measure the long-term joint health of adolescents with moderate and severe HA, according to severity and inhibitor status.
Methods: Pilot cross-sectional study of five European PedNet centres in moderate and severe HA patients aged 10-19 years. Structured assessment of joint status by physical examination (HJHS) and ultrasound (HEAD-US).
Results: In total, 141 HA patients were evaluable, 100 without inhibitors (81 severe, 19 moderate HA), and 41 severe HA with current/past inhibitors. On physical examination, 12/81 (15%) of severe HA without inhibitors, 3/19 (16%) of moderate HA, and 13/41 (32%) of severe HA patients with inhibitors exhibited joint abnormalities. Inhibitor persistence, longer inhibitor duration, and a high peak inhibitor level were associated with impaired joint health. Ultrasound showed joint damage (bone or cartilage) in 13/49 (27%) of severe HA without inhibitors, 1/12 (8%) of moderate HA, and 10/28 (36%) of severe HA patients with inhibitors. A discordant ankle evaluation by ultrasound versus physical examination was present in 53/169 joints (31%).
Conclusions: Most adolescents with severe or moderate HA show favourable joint health. Future research with combined ultrasound and/or MRI is needed to better understand joint outcomes in the remaining patients. Patents with inhibitors showed a two-fold increased proportion with joint deterioration. Ultrasound paired with physical examination increases sensitivity for detection of joint damage.
Keywords: adolescent; arthropathy; haemophilia A; paediatrics; ultrasonography.
© 2022 The Authors. Haemophilia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Susanna Ranta is an investigator in clinical trials sponsored by SOBI, Roche, Novo Nordisk, received grants for research from the Childhood Cancer Foundation and Stockholm County Council, and participated in Steering Committee for Roche. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Manco‐Johnson MJ, Abshire TC, Shapiro AD, et al. Prophylaxis versus episodic treatment to prevent joint disease in boys with severe hemophilia. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(6):535‐544. - PubMed
-
- den Uijl IEM, Fischer K, Van Der Bom JG, Grobbee DE, Rosendaal FR, Plug I. Clinical outcome of moderate haemophilia compared with severe and mild haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2009;15(1):83‐90. - PubMed
-
- Måseide RJ, Berntorp E, Astermark J, et al. Joint health and treatment modalities in Nordic patients with moderate haemophilia A and B ‐ The MoHem study. Haemophilia. 2020;26(5):891‐897. - PubMed
-
- Astermark J, Petrini P, Tengborn L, Schulman S, Ljung R, Berntorp E. Primary prophylaxis in severe haemophilia should be started at an early age but can be individualized. Br J Haematol. 1999;105(4):1109‐1113. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
