Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 4;6(8):e34497.
doi: 10.2196/34497.

The Assessment of a Personalized Nutrition Tool (eNutri) in Germany: Pilot Study on Usability Metrics and Users' Experiences

Birgit Kaiser #  1 , Tamara Stelzl #  2 , Paul Finglas  3 , Kurt Gedrich  1
Affiliations

The Assessment of a Personalized Nutrition Tool (eNutri) in Germany: Pilot Study on Usability Metrics and Users' Experiences

Birgit Kaiser et al. JMIR Form Res. .

Abstract

Background: To address the epidemic burden of diet-related diseases, adequate dietary intake assessments are needed to determine the actual nutrition intake of a population. In this context, the eNutri web app has been developed, providing online automated personalized dietary advice, based on nutritional information recorded via an integrated and validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Originally developed for a British population and their dietary habits, the eNutri tool has specifically been adapted to the German population, taking into account national eating habits and dietary recommendations.

Objective: The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the system usability and users' experience and feedback on the eNutri app in a small-scale preliminary study. The secondary aim is to investigate the efficacy of personalized nutrition (PN) recommendations versus general dietary advice in altering eating habits.

Methods: The app was piloted for 4 weeks by 106 participants from across Germany divided into a PN group and a control group. The groups differed according to the degree of personalization of dietary recommendations obtained.

Results: An overall System Usability Scale (SUS) score of 78.4 (SD 12.2) was yielded, indicating an above average user experience. Mean completion time of the FFQ was 26.7 minutes (SD 10.6 minutes). Across subgroups (age, sex, device screen sizes) no differences in SUS or completion time were found, indicating an equal performance for all users independent of the assigned experimental group. Participants' feedback highlighted the need for more personalized dietary advice for controls, while personalized nutritional recommendations improved the awareness of healthy eating behavior. Further improvements to the eNutri app were suggested by the app users.

Conclusions: In total, the eNutri app has proven to be a suitable instrument to capture the dietary habits of a German population sample. Regarding functionality, system usability, and handling, direct user feedback was quite positive. Nutritional advice given was rated ambivalent, pointing to several weaknesses in the eNutri app, minimizing the system's full potential. A higher level of personalization within nutritional advice subjectively improved the app's usability. The insights gained will be used as a basis to further develop and improve this digital diet assessment tool.

Keywords: Diet Quality Score; EIT Food Quisper; Food Frequency Questionnaire; dietary assessment; digital nutrition; eNutri; internet; personalized nutrition; system usability; web application.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: BK, TS, and KG declare that there are no conflicts of interest. PMF is a member of the European Food Information Council (EUFIC) governance Board of Directors representative.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Box plot analysis of the Likert-scale ratings.
Figure 2
Figure 2
In-app feedback related to eNutri-induced changes in dietary behaviour.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Willingness to pay for the eNutri app across PN and control group.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Afshin A, Sur PJ, Fay KA, Cornaby L, Ferrara G, Salama JS, Mullany EC, Abate KH, Abbafati C, Abebe Z, Afarideh M, Aggarwal A, Agrawal S, Akinyemiju T, Alahdab F, Bacha U, Bachman VF, Badali H, Badawi A, Bensenor IM, Bernabe E, Biadgilign SKK, Biryukov SH, Cahill LE, Carrero JJ, Cercy KM, Dandona L, Dandona R, Dang AK, Degefa MG, El Sayed Zaki M, Esteghamati A, Esteghamati S, Fanzo J, Farinha CSES, Farvid MS, Farzadfar F, Feigin VL, Fernandes JC, Flor LS, Foigt NA, Forouzanfar MH, Ganji M, Geleijnse JM, Gillum RF, Goulart AC, Grosso G, Guessous I, Hamidi S, Hankey GJ, Harikrishnan S, Hassen HY, Hay SI, Hoang CL, Horino M, Ikeda N, Islami F, Jackson MD, James SL, Johansson L, Jonas JB, Kasaeian A, Khader YS, Khalil IA, Khang Y, Kimokoti RW, Kokubo Y, Kumar GA, Lallukka T, Lopez AD, Lorkowski S, Lotufo PA, Lozano R, Malekzadeh R, März W, Meier T, Melaku YA, Mendoza W, Mensink GB, Micha R, Miller TR, Mirarefin M, Mohan V, Mokdad AH, Mozaffarian D, Nagel G, Naghavi M, Nguyen CT, Nixon MR, Ong KL, Pereira DM, Poustchi H, Qorbani M, Rai RK, Razo-García C, Rehm CD, Rivera JA, Rodríguez-Ramírez S, Roshandel G, Roth GA, Sanabria J, Sánchez-Pimienta TG, Sartorius B, Schmidhuber J, Schutte AE, Sepanlou SG, Shin M, Sorensen RJ, Springmann M, Szponar L, Thorne-Lyman AL, Thrift AG, Touvier M, Tran BX, Tyrovolas S, Ukwaja KN, Ullah I, Uthman OA, Vaezghasemi M, Vasankari TJ, Vollset SE, Vos T, Vu GT, Vu LG, Weiderpass E, Werdecker A, Wijeratne T, Willett WC, Wu JH, Xu G, Yonemoto N, Yu C, Murray CJL. Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet. 2019 May;393(10184):1958–1972. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30041-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zazpe I, Santiago S, De la Fuente-Arrillaga C, Nuñez-Córdoba Jorge M, Bes-Rastrollo M, Martínez-González Miguel Angel. Paper-Based Versus Web-Based Versions of Self-Administered Questionnaires, Including Food-Frequency Questionnaires: Prospective Cohort Study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2019 Oct 01;5(4):e11997. doi: 10.2196/11997. https://publichealth.jmir.org/2019/4/e11997/ v5i4e11997 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vaghefi I, Tulu B. The Continued Use of Mobile Health Apps: Insights From a Longitudinal Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Aug 29;7(8):e12983. doi: 10.2196/12983. https://mhealth.jmir.org/2019/8/e12983/ v7i8e12983 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations . Dietary assessment: A resource guide to method selection and application in low resource settings. Rome, Italy: FAO; 2018.
    1. Al-Shaar L, Yuan C, Rosner B, Dean SB, Ivey KL, Clowry CM, Sampson LA, Barnett JB, Rood J, Harnack LJ, Block J, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Rimm EB. Reproducibility and Validity of a Semiquantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire in Men Assessed by Multiple Methods. Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Jun 01;190(6):1122–1132. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwaa280.6043914 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources