Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec;36(8):1386-1396.
doi: 10.1037/fam0001013. Epub 2022 Aug 4.

Links of we-talk to caregiver social network systems and health

Affiliations

Links of we-talk to caregiver social network systems and health

Melissa Zajdel et al. J Fam Psychol. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Caring for a child, particularly one with a rare disease, presents a challenging set of stressors that can impact entire family networks. Given this shared impact, caregivers can engage in communal coping to address the caregiving process, defined as the perception of caregiving as shared and collaborative behaviors to address it. In this study, we examined one common measure of communal coping-first person plural pronouns or "we-talk"-in caregivers of either (a) children with rare or undiagnosed diseases or (b) typically developing children. We sought to examine how we-talk is linked to (a) caregiver health and well-being and (b) social network involvement in caregiving. Caregivers (n = 311) participated in (a) survey questionnaires (b) a network enumeration interview and (c) a semistructured interview of caregiving. Results indicated we-talk was unrelated to stress or self-rated health, but was linked to more benefit-finding; greater individual-focused language (I-talk) was also linked to worse self-rated health. Additionally, we-talk was unrelated to malfeasant behavior (e.g., overly critical), but was linked to less nonfeasant behavior (e.g., underinvolvement), more uplift behavior (e.g., helping with caregiving), and more health-related communication with network members. Further, these findings did not differ across caregiving context. This work highlights the role of communal coping for caregivers managing general parenting stress as well as the stress associated with caring for a child with complex medical needs. Future research should continue to examine how interpersonal coping processes operate within social networks to impact health and well-being for all involved. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01498263.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Afifi TD, Hutchinson S, & Krouse S (2006). Toward a theoretical model of communal coping in postdivorce families and other naturally occurring groups. Communication Theory, 16(3), 378–409. 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00275.x - DOI
    1. Afifi TD, Basinger ED, & Kam JA (2020). The extended theoretical model of communal coping: Understanding the properties and functionality of communal coping. Journal of Communication, 70(3), 424–446. 10.1093/joc/jqaa006 - DOI
    1. Alves S, Fonseca A, Canavarro MC, & Pereira M (2020). Does dyadic coping predict couples’ postpartum psychosocial adjustment? A dyadic longitudinal study. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 2401. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561091 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Antonucci TC, & Akiyama H (1987). Social networks in adult life and a preliminary examination of the convoy model. Journal of gerontology, 42(5), 519–527. 10.1093/geronj/42.5.519 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ashida S, Marcum CS, & Koehly LM (2018). Unmet expectations in Alzheimer’s family caregiving: Interactional characteristics associated with perceived under-contribution. The Gerontologist, 58(2), e46–e55. 10.1093/geront/gnx141 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Associated data