Methods to Evaluate the Potential Clinical Significance of Antibodies to Red Blood Cells
- PMID: 35926124
- PMCID: PMC12016456
- DOI: 10.1002/cpz1.504
Methods to Evaluate the Potential Clinical Significance of Antibodies to Red Blood Cells
Abstract
Immune-mediated red blood cell (RBC) destruction due to antibodies is an ongoing problem in transfusion medicine for the selection of the safest blood. Serological testing often revealed incompatibility with donors' RBCs. When this incompatible blood was transfused, destruction was due mostly to extravascular-mediated phagocytosis of the antibody-opsonized RBCs; however, intravascular hemolysis was sometimes observed without explanation. Based on serology, antibodies with potential for clinical sequalae could not be ascertained; thus, antigen-negative blood was usually selected for transfusion to avoid problems. Antibodies to antigens having very high frequency in the general population (>95%), however, made selection of antigen-negative blood difficult and sometimes impossible. Some patients, who were sensitized by previous transfusions or by pregnancy, developed multiple antibodies, again creating a problem for finding compatible blood for transfusion, without the ability to discern which of the antibodies may be clinically irrelevant and ignored. Transfusion medicine scientists began searching for an in vitro means to determine the in vivo outcome of transfusion of blood that was serologically incompatible. Methods such as chemiluminescence, monocyte-macrophage phagocytosis, and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) were described. Over the years, the monocyte monolayer assay (MMA) has emerged as the most reliable in vitro assay for the prediction of the clinical relevance of a given antibody. ADCC has not been fully studied but has the potential to be useful for predicting which antibodies may result in intravascular hemolysis. This article captures the protocols for the implementation and readout of the MMA and ADCC assays for use in predicting the clinical significance of antibodies in a transfusion setting. © 2022 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Monocyte monolayer assay (MMA) Basic Protocol 2: Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity assay (ADCC).
Keywords: ADCC; MMA; antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity; clinically significant RBC antibodies; monocyte monolayer assay.
© 2022 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
The monocyte monolayer assay, an in vitro method for prediction of in vivo survival of transfused incompatible red blood cells: a review.Immunohematology. 2023 Jul 5;39(2):61-69. doi: 10.21307/immunohematology-2023-010. eCollection 2023 Jun 1. Immunohematology. 2023. PMID: 37405851 Review.
-
The Monocyte Monolayer Assay: Past, Present and Future.Transfus Med Rev. 2019 Jan;33(1):24-28. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Aug 8. Transfus Med Rev. 2019. PMID: 30139679 Review.
-
A retrospective analysis of the value of monocyte monolayer assay results for predicting the clinical significance of blood group alloantibodies.Transfusion. 2004 Sep;44(9):1273-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2004.03427.x. Transfusion. 2004. PMID: 15318848
-
A comparison of results from antihuman globulin-graded reactions with the monocyte monolayer assay.Immunohematology. 2023 Jul 5;39(2):77-81. doi: 10.21307/immunohematology-2023-013. eCollection 2023 Jun 1. Immunohematology. 2023. PMID: 37405849
-
Transfusion of multiple units of Js(b+) red blood cells in the presence of anti-Jsb in a patient with sickle beta-thalassemia disease and a review of the literature.Immunohematology. 2007;23(2):75-80. Immunohematology. 2007. PMID: 18004938 Review.
References
-
- Branch, D. R. , Gallagher, M. T. , Mison, A. P. , Sy Siok Hian, A. L. , & Petz, L. D. (1984). In vitro determination of red cell alloantibody significance using an assay of monocyte‐macrophage interaction with sensitized erythrocytes. British Journal of Haematology, 56, 19–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1984.tb01268.x - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources