Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 2;40(5):111156.
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111156.

METTL14-dependent m6A modification controls iNKT cell development and function

Affiliations

METTL14-dependent m6A modification controls iNKT cell development and function

Liang Cao et al. Cell Rep. .

Abstract

N6-methyladenosine (m6A), the most common form of RNA modification, controls CD4+ T cell homeostasis by targeting the IL-7/STAT5/SOCS signaling pathways. The role of m6A modification in unconventional T cell development remains unknown. Using mice with T cell-specific deletion of RNA methyltransferase METTL14 (T-Mettl14-/-), we demonstrate that m6A modification is indispensable for iNKT cell homeostasis. Loss of METTL14-dependent m6A modification leads to the upregulation of apoptosis in double-positive thymocytes, which in turn decreases Vα14-Jα18 gene rearrangements, resulting in drastic reduction of iNKT numbers in the thymus and periphery. Residual T-Mettl14-/- iNKT cells exhibit increased apoptosis, impaired maturation, and decreased responsiveness to IL-2/IL-15 and TCR stimulation. Furthermore, METTL14 knockdown in mature iNKT cells diminishes their cytokine production, correlating with increased Cish expression and decreased TCR signaling. Collectively, our study highlights a critical role for METTL14-dependent-m6A modification in iNKT cell development and function.

Keywords: CD1; CP: Immunology; CP: Molecular biology; NKT cells; T cell development; knockout mice; m(6)A.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests H.H. is an employee of Genentech.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. iNKT cell development is severely impaired in T-Mettl14−/− mice
(A) m6A level in total mRNA of CD4+, CD8+ T cells, and iNKT cells (naive and activated) (n = 5–6). (B) Immunoblot of METTL14 and METTL3 in total thymocytes and TCRβ+ splenocytes in WT and T-Mettl14−/− mice. Data representative of three independent experiments. (C) Representative staining of lymphocytes in indicated organs from WT and T-Mettl14−/− mice with CD1d/PBS57 tetramer or unloaded CD1d tetramer. (D and E) Summary of frequencies and cell numbers of iNKT cells in the indicated organs from WT and T-Mettl14−/− mice (n = 5–8). SEM is shown. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Defective development of iNKT cells in T-Mettl14−/− mice is cell intrinsic
(A) Representative histogram of CD1d expression on DP thymocytes. CD1d was stained with α-CD1d or isotype control antibody (n = 8). (B) IL-2 detected by ELISA following 48-h co-culture of iNKT cell hybridoma DN32.D3 with irradiated thymocytes pulsed with α-GalCer ranging from 200 ng/mL to 12.5 ng/mL. Data representative of three independent experiments. (C) Flow cytometric analysis of iNKT cells in the Jα18−/− recipient mice after 6 weeks of reconstitution with 1:1 mixture of bone marrow cells from WT (CD45.1) and T-Mettl14−/− (CD45.2). (D) Quantification of iNKT cell reconstitution in thymus, spleen, and liver in bone marrow chimera recipients (n = 7). SEM is shown. ***p < 0.001.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Mettl14 deficiency impairs the maturation of iNKT cells
(A) Representative staining of iNKT cells (CD69+CD1d/PBS57 tetramer+) at various developmental stages in the thymus of WT and T-Mettl14−/− mice. (B and C) Quantification of percentages and cell numbers of stages 0, 1, 2, and 3 iNKT cells in WT and T-Mettl14−/− mice (n = 3–4). (D) Intracellular staining of PLZF, T-bet, and RORγt in thymic iNKT cells of WT and T-Mettl14−/− mice. (E and F) Quantification of percentages and cell numbers of NKT1, NKT2+NKTpre, and NKT17 subsets (n = 6). SEM is shown. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. m6A maintains DP thymocyte survival in part through regulation of the p53-mediated apoptosis pathway
(A) RNA-seq results of DP thymocytes from WT and T-Mettl14−/− mice with indicated gene labeling (n = 3). Data shown are fold change of T-Mettl14−/−/WT. (B) Heatmap of differentially expressed protein-coding genes and long non-coding RNA. Gene set enrichment analysis showing enrichment for hallmark p53 pathway (C) and apoptosis pathway (D) in T-Mettl14−/− DP thymocytes. (E) Relative expression of Mettl14, Hmga1b, Trim25, and Xaf1 in DP thymocytes of T-Mettl14−/− mice detected by qPCR. (F) Relative expression of Hmga1b, Trim25, and Xaf1 in the m6A RNA immunoprecipitation versus total thymocyte RNA in WT mice detected by qPCR (n = 3–4). SEM is shown. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.. Elevated apoptosis in T-Mettl14−/− DP thymocytes is rescued by the scavenger of ROS
(A) Representative staining of apoptosis markers of naive and activated DP thymocytes. (B) Percentage of Annexin V+ cells in ex vivo, 6-h medium culture, or anti-CD3/anti-CD4-stimulated DP thymocytes from WT and T-Mettl14−/− mice (n = 5–6). (C) Intracellular ROS in DP thymocytes detected by DCFDA (n = 5). (D) Percentage of Annexin V+ population in DP thymocytes after 6-h incubation with or without NAC (n = 5). (E) Relative expression of Vα14-Jα18 in DP thymocytes of T-Mettl14−/− mice (n = 5). (F) Percentage of Annexin V+ population of iNKT cells in WT and T-Mettl14−/− mice from thymus, spleen, and liver (n = 7). (G) Percentage of Annexin V+ population of iNKT thymocytes at different developmental stages (n = 7). SEM is shown. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.. Upregulation of m6A target gene Cish in Mettl14-deficient thymocytes correlates with decreased TCR signaling and impaired cytokine response
(A) Relative expression of Cish in naive and activated (anti-CD3/anti-CD4) DP thymocytes (n = 5–9). (B) Relative expression of Cish in the m6A RNA immunoprecipitation of total thymocytes RNA in WT mice by qPCR quantification (n = 4). (C) Intracellular calcium flux in DP thymocytes in response to crosslinking of anti-CD3/anti-CD4 in T-Mettl14−/− mice. (D and E) Quantification of maximum calcium flux on crosslinking and addition of Ca2+ in T-Mettl14−/− DP cells (n = 5–6). (F) Representative staining of thymic iNKT cell expansion at day 3 after stimulation with IL-2 or IL-15. (G and H) Percentage and cell number of thymic iNKT cells on D0 and D3 after stimulation with IL-2 or IL-15 (n = 5). (I) Representative figure of cell trace distribution in thymic iNKT cells on day 3 post-stimulation with IL-2 or IL-15 (n = 5–6). Unstimulated thymocytes were used as controls. (J) Bar graph of pSTAT5 in iNKT thymocytes after 20 min of IL-15 stimulation (n = 5). SEM is shown. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.. Mettl14-deficiency impairs mature iNKT cell function
(A) Dot plots of IFN-γ and IL-4 in residual iNKT cells from T-Mettl14−/− mice after in vivo α-GalCer stimulation. (B) Quantification of the percentage of IFN-γ and IL-4 producing iNKT cells in α-GalCer-immunized WT and T-Mettl14−/− mice (n = 4). (C) Expression of METTL14 in DN32.D3 cells transduced with lentivirus coding Mettl14-specific shRNA (shMettl14-1 or shMettl14-2) or control shRNA (shNC). (D) m6A level in mRNA of DN32.D3 cells transduced with shMettl14-2 and shNC. (E) Relative expression of Mettl14 and Cish in DN32.D3-shMettl14-2 in medium or stimulation with α-GalCer for 24 h. (F) Production of IL-2 in DN32.D3-shMettl14-2 after stimulation with α-GalCer for 24 h quantified by ELISA. (G) Intracellular calcium flux in DN32.D3-shMettl14-2 cells in response to α-GalCer/Ca2+. (H) Quantification of maximum calcium flux upon α-GalCer stimulation. Data representative of three to six independent experiments. shNC or shMettl14-2-treated DN32.D3 were spin-transduced with retrovirus carrying shCish or shNC. Zsgreen+ cells were sorted and cultured. (I) Relative expression of Cish in the indicated groups. (J) IL-2 production in shNC/shNC-treated (‘‘WT’’ control) and shNC and shCish-treated Mettl14KD DN32.D3 cells after stimulation with α-GalCer for 24 h. Vα14Tg splenocytes were nucleofected with rCas9/gRNA complex and maintained in complete RPMI supplemented with IL-2 for 3 days. (K) Mettl14 and Cish expression by qPCR on day 3 after nucleofection. (L) Absolute cell numbers of iNKT and CD4+ T cells after nucleofection. (M) IFN-γ production in iNKT and CD4+ T cells after nucleofection (n = 3–4). SEM is shown. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alarcón CR, Lee H, Goodarzi H, Halberg N, and Tavazoie SF (2015). N6-methyladenosine marks primary microRNAs for processing. Nature 519, 482–485. 10.1038/nature14281. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aman MJ, Migone TS, Sasaki A, Ascherman DP, Zhu MH, Soldaini E, Imada K, Miyajima A, Yoshimura A, and Leonard WJ (1999). CIS associates with the interleukin-2 receptor beta chain and inhibits interleukin-2-dependent signaling. J. Biol. Chem 274, 30266–30272. 10.1074/jbc.274.42.30266. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anders S, Pyl PT, and Huber W (2015). HTSeq–a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 166–169. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baldwin TA, Hogquist KA, and Jameson SC (2004). The fourth way? Harnessing aggressive tendencies in the thymus. J. Immunol 173, 6515–6520. 10.4049/jimmunol.173.11.6515. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baranek T, Lebrigand K, de Amat Herbozo C, Gonzalez L, Bogard G, Dietrich C, Magnone V, Boisseau C, Jouan Y, Trottein F, et al. (2020). High dimensional single-cell analysis reveals iNKT cell developmental trajectories and effector fate decision. Cell Rep 32, 108116. 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108116. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types