Outcomes of Redo Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement According to the Initial and Subsequent Valve Type
- PMID: 35926921
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.05.016
Outcomes of Redo Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement According to the Initial and Subsequent Valve Type
Abstract
Background: As transcatheter aortic valve (TAV) replacement is increasingly used in patients with longer life expectancy, a sizable proportion will require redo TAV replacement (TAVR). The unique configuration of balloon-expandable TAV (bTAV) vs a self-expanding TAV (sTAV) potentially affects TAV-in-TAV outcome.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to better inform prosthesis selection, TAV-in-TAV outcomes were assessed according to the type of initial and subsequent TAV.
Methods: Patients from the Redo-TAVR registry were analyzed using propensity weighting according to their initial valve type (bTAV [n = 115] vs sTAV [n = 106]) and subsequent valve type (bTAV [n = 130] vs sTAV [n = 91]).
Results: Patients with failed bTAVs presented later (vs sTAV) (4.9 ± 2.1 years vs 3.7 ± 2.3 years; P < 0.001), with smaller effective orifice area (1.0 ± 0.7 cm2 vs 1.3 ± 0.8 cm2; P = 0.018) and less frequent dominant regurgitation (16.2% vs 47.3%; P < 0.001). Mortality at 30 days was 2.3% (TAV-in-bTAV) vs 0% (TAV-in-sTAV) (P = 0.499) and 1.7% (bTAV-in-TAV) vs 1.0% (sTAV-in-TAV) (P = 0.612); procedural safety was 72.6% (TAV-in-bTAV) vs 71.2% (TAV-in-sTAV) (P = 0.817) and 73.2% (bTAV-in-TAV) vs 76.5% (sTAV-in-TAV) (P = 0.590). Device success was similar according to initial valve type but higher with subsequent sTAV vs bTAV (77.2% vs 64.3%; P = 0.045), primarily because of lower residual gradients (10.3 mm Hg [8.9-11.7 mm Hg] vs 15.2 mm Hg [13.2-17.1 mm Hg]; P < 0.001). Residual regurgitation (moderate or greater) was similar after bTAV-in-TAV and sTAV-in-TAV (5.7%) and nominally higher after TAV-in-bTAV (9.1%) vs TAV-in-sTAV (4.4%) (P = 0.176).
Conclusions: In selected patients, no association was observed between TAV type and redo TAVR safety or mortality, yet subsequent sTAV was associated with higher device success because of lower redo gradients. These findings are preliminary, and more data are needed to guide valve choice for redo TAVR.
Keywords: TAVR; balloon-expandable valve; redo TAVR; self-expanding valve; valve-in-valve.
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Webb is a consultant to and has received research funding from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott Vascular, and Boston Scientific. Dr Kim is a proctor for and has received speaker fees from Boston Scientific, Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Abdel-Wahab has received speaker honoraria and/or consultancy fees to the hospital on his behalf from Boston Scientific and Medtronic. Dr Barbanti is a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences; and is an advisory board member for Biotronik. Dr Søndergaard has received consulting fees and institutional research grants from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Symetis. Dr Redwood is a proctor for and has received lecture fees from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Hamm is an advisory board member for Medtronic. Dr Sinning has received speaker honoraria and research grants from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Sathananthan is a consultant to Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Schofer has received speaker fees and travel compensation from Boston Scientific; and has received travel compensation from Edwards Lifesciences and Abbott/St. Jude Medical. Dr Andreas is a proctor, consultant, and speaker for Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, and Medtronic; and has received institutional grants from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, Medtronic, and LSI. Dr Guerrero has received research grant support from Abbott Vascular and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Castriota is a proctor for Medtronic and Boston Scientific. Dr Nazif is a consultant for or has received honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Biotrace, and Baylis Medical; and is a consultant for and holds equity in Venus Medtech. Dr Pilgrim has received research grants from Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Biotronik; and has received speaker fees from Boston Scientific and Biotronik. Dr Babaliaros is a consultant to Edwards Lifesciences; and holds equity in Transmural Systems. Dr Van Mieghem has received institutional research grants and consulting fees from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Daiichi Sankyo, and PulseCath; and has received institutional research grant support from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Latib has received institutional research and grant support from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Edwards Lifesciences; and has received personal consulting honoraria from Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Hildick-Smith is a proctor and adviser for Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Edwards Lifesciences. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
Similar articles
-
Transcatheter Replacement of Transcatheter Versus Surgically Implanted Aortic Valve Bioprostheses.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jan 5;77(1):1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.10.053. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021. PMID: 33413929
-
Outcomes of repeat transcatheter aortic valve replacement with balloon-expandable valves: a registry study.Lancet. 2023 Oct 28;402(10412):1529-1540. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01636-7. Epub 2023 Aug 31. Lancet. 2023. PMID: 37660719
-
Redo-transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the supra-annular, self-expandable Evolut platform: Insights from the Transcatheter valve Therapy Registry.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;99(3):869-876. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29941. Epub 2021 Sep 17. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022. PMID: 34533891
-
Redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement in degenerated transcatheter bioprosthesis (TAV-in-TAV).Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2023 Jul-Dec;21(10):703-712. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2023.2266368. Epub 2023 Oct 26. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2023. PMID: 37815845 Review.
-
A Guide to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Design and Systematic Planning for a Redo-TAV (TAV-in-TAV) Procedure.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Jul 22;17(14):1631-1651. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.04.047. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024. PMID: 39048251 Review.
Cited by
-
Redo-TAVI with the SAPIEN 3 valve in degenerated calcified CoreValve/Evolut explants.EuroIntervention. 2024 Nov 18;20(22):1390-1404. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00619. EuroIntervention. 2024. PMID: 39552484
-
Repeat Interventions After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Considerations for Lifetime Management-The First Cut Is the Deepest.Struct Heart. 2025 Feb 15;9(5):100426. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2025.100426. eCollection 2025 May. Struct Heart. 2025. PMID: 40529660 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Feasibility of redo-TAVI in self-expanding Evolut valves: a CT analysis from the Evolut Low Risk Trial substudy.EuroIntervention. 2023 Jul 17;19(4):e330-e339. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-01125. EuroIntervention. 2023. PMID: 37067193 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Balloon aortic valvuloplasty with simultaneous aortic root injection: a case report of an adjunctive strategy to computed tomography for predicting coronary obstruction in transcatheter aortic valve-in-transcatheter aortic valve procedures.Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2024 Nov 26;8(12):ytae622. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytae622. eCollection 2024 Dec. Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2024. PMID: 39659472 Free PMC article.
-
Valve-in-valve procedures for degenerated surgical and transcatheter aortic valve bioprostheses using a latest-generation self-expanding intra-annular transcatheter heart valve.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Sep 1;10:1209184. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1209184. eCollection 2023. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 37727306 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials