Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 4;23(1):316.
doi: 10.1186/s12859-022-04863-z.

ImputAccur: fast and user-friendly calculation of genotype-imputation accuracy-measures

Affiliations

ImputAccur: fast and user-friendly calculation of genotype-imputation accuracy-measures

Kolja A Thormann et al. BMC Bioinformatics. .

Abstract

Background: ImputAccur is a software tool to measure genotype-imputation accuracy. Imputation of untyped markers is a standard approach in genome-wide association studies to close the gap between directly genotyped and other known DNA variants. However, high accuracy for imputed genotypes is fundamental. Several accuracy measures have been proposed, but unfortunately, they are implemented on different platforms, which is impractical.

Results: With ImputAccur, the accuracy measures info, Iam-hiQ and r2-based indices can be derived from standard output files of imputation software. Sample/probe and marker filtering is possible. This allows e.g. accurate marker filtering ahead of data analysis.

Conclusions: The source code (Python version 3.9.4), a standalone executive file, and example data for ImputAccur are freely available at https://gitlab.gwdg.de/kolja.thormann1/imputationquality.git .

Keywords: Accuracy; GWAS; Imputation; Marker selection; Quality control; SNP.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Example of real-data genotype-imputation accuracy-measures for the telomere region on chromosome 9. Top left: hiQ, top right: info, centre left: Iamchance, centre right: IamHWE, bottom left: rBeagle2, bottom right: rMACH2; each dot represents one imputed marker; the marker size is according to minor allele frequency (MAF); threshold values are freely selectable; vertical lines: centre of region classified as: “cold”, “tepid”, “hot”, or “very hot” (the definition is given in the Additional file 1).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hickey JM, Cleveland MA, Maltecca C, Gorjanc G, Gredler B, Kranis A. Genotype imputation to increase sample size in pedigreed populations. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;1019:395–410. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-447-0_17. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Das S, Abecasis GR, Browning BL. Genotype imputation from large reference panels. Annu Rev Genom Hum Genet. 2018;31(19):73–96. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-083117-021602. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marchini J, Howie B. Genotype imputation for genome-wide association studies. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11(7):499–511. doi: 10.1038/nrg2796. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Winkler TW, Day FR, Croteau-Chonka DC, Wood AR, Locke AE, Magi R. Quality control and conduct of genome-wide association meta-analyses. Nat Protoc. 2014;9(5):1192–1212. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.071. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Browning BL, Browning SR. A unified approach to genotype imputation and haplotype-phase inference for large data sets of trios and unrelated individuals. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;84(2):210–223. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.01.005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources