Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 4;22(1):615.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04943-1.

Performances of birthweight charts to predict adverse perinatal outcomes related to SGA in a cohort of nulliparas

Affiliations

Performances of birthweight charts to predict adverse perinatal outcomes related to SGA in a cohort of nulliparas

Rafael B Galvão et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Small-for-gestational-age neonates (SGA) are at increased risk of neonatal morbidity. Nulliparity represents a risk factor for SGA; birthweight charts may perform differently for the detection of SGA among nulliparas. This study aimed at describing the prevalence of SGA in nulliparas according to different birthweight charts and evaluating the diagnostic performance of these charts to maternal and perinatal outcomes.

Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a Brazilian cohort of nulliparas named Preterm SAMBA study. Birthweight centiles were calculated using the Intergrowth-21st, WHO-Fetal Growth Charts, Birth in Brazil population chart and GROW-customised chart. The risks of outcomes among SGA neonates and their mothers in comparison to neonates with birthweights between the 40th-60th centiles were calculated, according to each chart. ROC curves were used to detect neonatal morbidity in neonates with birth weights below different cutoff centiles for each chart.

Results: A sample of 997 nulliparas was assessed. The rate of SGA infants varied between 7.0-11.6%. All charts showed a significantly lower risk of caesarean sections in women delivering SGA neonates compared to those delivering adequate-for-gestational-age neonates (OR 0.55-0.64, p < .05). The charts had poor performance (AUC 0.492 - 0.522) for the detection of neonatal morbidity related to SGA born at term.

Conclusion: The populational and customised birthweight charts detected different prevalence of small-for-gestational-age neonates and showed similar and poor performance to identify related neonatal adverse outcomes in this population.

Keywords: Adverse neonatal outcome; Birthweight; Birthweight centiles; Birthweight chart; Fetal growth restriction; Neonatal morbidity; Nulliparity; Small-for-gestational-age.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study population
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Proportion of nullipara women who gave birth to SGA infants (birthweight < 10th centile) according to different charts
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Rate (95% CI) of adverse outcomes up to the 10th birthweight centile according to different charts

References

    1. Nardozza LM, Caetano AC, Zamarian AC, Mazzola JB, Silva CP, Marçal VM, et al. Fetal growth restriction: current knowledge. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295(5):1061–1077. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4341-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Melamed N, Baschat A, Yinon Y, Athanasiadis A, Mecacci F, Figueras F, et al. FIGO (international Federation of Gynecology and obstetrics) initiative on fetal growth: best practice advice for screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal growth restriction. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021;152 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):3–57. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13522. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lees CC, Stampalija T, Baschat A, da Silva CF, Ferrazzi E, Figueras F, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: diagnosis and management of small-for-gestational-age fetus and fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;56(2):298–312. doi: 10.1002/uog.22134. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Souza RT, Vieira MC, Esteves-Pereira AP, Domingues RMSM, Moreira MEL, Filho EVC, et al. Risk stratification for small for gestational age for the Brazilian population: a secondary analysis of the Birth in Brazil study. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):14725. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71252-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Figueras F, Gratacos E. Stage-based approach to the management of fetal growth restriction. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34(7):655–659. doi: 10.1002/pd.4412. - DOI - PubMed