Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 4;18(1):300.
doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03404-3.

Comparison of post-operative outcomes after open or closed surgical techniques to stabilize metacarpal and metatarsal fractures in dogs and cats

Gabriel Carbonell Rosselló  1   2 , Jasmin Carmel  3 , Matthew Pead  4 , Victor Vidal Lacosta  5 , Pilar Lafuente  5
Affiliations

Comparison of post-operative outcomes after open or closed surgical techniques to stabilize metacarpal and metatarsal fractures in dogs and cats

Gabriel Carbonell Rosselló et al. BMC Vet Res. .

Abstract

Backfround: Treatment options for metacarpal/metatarsal fractures include conservative and surgical management. The aim of this study is to determine whether there is any significant difference in healing and complication rates, between open and closed treatment. Medical records of dogs and cats with metacarpal/metatarsal fractures with complete follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were allocated in two groups: open or closed stabilization. Minor and major complications were recorded and compared. Fracture healing was classified as good, delayed and non-union, and it was statistically compared.

Results: Sixty-three patients (35 dogs and 28 cats) were included. Thirty-one were treated with an open approach and 32 by a closed stabilization. Regarding fracture healing a significantly higher proportion of delayed healing/non-union was found in the closed group (12/32 vs 2/31). Regarding postoperative complications, a significantly higher number of animals in the open group did not develop any complications (12/31 vs 3/32). A significantly higher proportion of minor complications were reported in the closed group (27/32 vs 12/31). However, a higher number of major complications was reported in the open group (7/31 vs 2/32) although this was not statistically significant. Fracture malalignment was significantly more prevalent in patients undergoing closed stabilization (11/32 vs 2/31).

Conclusion: According to the results, better healing, fracture alignment and a lower complication rate are found when fractures are stabilised with an open technique. However, other factors such as configuration of the fracture, soft tissue involvement, patient´s character and client´s situation would also need to be taken into account in the decision of stabilization technique.

Keywords: Cat; Dog; Fracture; Metacarpus; Metatarsus; Outcome; Surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Neither of the authors of this article have a financial or personal relationship with other individuals or organizations which could inappropriately influence or bias the content of this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The proportion of patients allocated to each healing category, in open and closed repair groups
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Comparing the number of repeat visits for open and closed repair techniques
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Comparing the number of complications in the open and the closed repair group
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Comparing the number of cases experienced malalignment between open and close groups
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Minar M, Hwang Y, Park M, et al. Retrospective study on fractures in dogs. J Biomed Res. 2013;14(3):140–144. doi: 10.12729/jbr.2013.14.3.140. - DOI
    1. Failing K, Matis U, Kornmayer M. Long-term prognosis of metacarpal and metatarsal fractures in dogs. Vet Comp Orthopaed. 2014;27(01):45–53. doi: 10.3415/VCOT-13-03-0038. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kornmayer M, Matis U, Zahn K. ‘Dowel’ pinning for feline metacarpal and metatarsal fractures. Vet Comp Orthopaed. 2007;20(04):256–263. doi: 10.1160/VCOT-07-04-0035. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Phillips I. A survey of bone fractures in the dog and cat. J Small Anim Pract. 1979;20(11):661–674. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1979.tb06679.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Muir P, Norris J. Metacarpal and metatarsal fractures in dogs. J Small Anim Pract. 1997;38(8):344–348. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1997.tb03482.x. - DOI - PubMed